首页> 外文期刊>Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery >Evaluation of the efficacy of adjunctive lamotrigine in the treatment of epilepsy and depression with Meta-analysis
【24h】

Evaluation of the efficacy of adjunctive lamotrigine in the treatment of epilepsy and depression with Meta-analysis

机译:荟萃分析评价拉莫三嗪辅助治疗癫痫和抑郁症的疗效

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of adjunctive lamotrigine in the treatment of patients with epilepsy and comorbid depressive symptoms. Methods Relevant clinical trials were searched via PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Data from January 1998 to June 2014 using the following retrieval words: lamotrigine, epilepsy and depressive both in Chinese and English. The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 5.0.2) was used to evaluate the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of included articles and abstracted the data. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.1.1 software. Results According to the inclusion criteria, 3 prospective clinical trials with a total of 668 patients were finally selected. The Meta-analysis showed the Beck Depression Inventory-Ⅱ (BDI-Ⅱ) score ( MD =?- 8.400, 95%CI:?- 10.890— -?5.920; P = 0.000), Cornell Dysthymia Rating Scale (CDRS) score ( MD =?- 8.240, 95% CI:?- 11.180— - 5.290; P = 0.000) and Profile of Mood States (POMS) score ( MD =?- 24.210, 95%CI:?- 30.740— -?17.680; P = 0.000) in lamotrigine group were significantly improved compared to those in control group. As for 6 mood states in POMS, the scores of tension-anxiety ( MD =?- 3.360, 95%CI:?- 4.620—?- 2.100; P = 0.000), depression-dejection ( MD =?- 5.490, 95%CI:?- 7.420— - 3.560; P = 0.000), anger-hostility (MD =?- 3.870, 95%CI:?- 5.510—?- 2.230; P = 0.000), fatigue-inertia ( MD =?- 4.480, 95%CI:?- 5.630—?- 3.320; P = 0.000), confusion-bewilderment ( MD =?- 2.720, 95%CI:?- 3.730—?- 1.720; P = 0.000) in lamotrigine group were all significantly lower than those in control group, while the score of vigor-activity ( MD = 3.970, 95% CI: 2.870-5.070; P = 0.000) was significantly higher than that in control group. Conclusions The effect of adjunctive lamotrigine in the treatment of patients with epilepsy and depression is favorable. The most common side effects include rash and stimulation of central nervous system. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2016.01.005
机译:目的评价拉莫三嗪辅助治疗癫痫合并抑郁症状的疗效。方法检索1998年1月至2014年6月间PubMed,Cochrane对照试验中心登记册,中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)和万方数据的相关临床试验,使用以下检索词:拉莫三嗪,癫痫和抑郁症英语。 《 Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册》(版本5.0.2)用于评估随机对照试验(RCT)的质量。两位审稿人独立评估了收录文章的质量并提取了数据。使用RevMan 5.1.1软件进行荟萃分析。结果根据纳入标准,最终选择了3项前瞻性临床试验,共668例患者。荟萃分析显示贝克抑郁量表Ⅱ(BDI-Ⅱ)得分(MD =?-8.400,95%CI:?-10.890--?5.920; P = 0.000),康奈尔抑郁症评分量表(CDRS)得分( MD =?-8.240,95%CI:?-11.180--5.290; P = 0.000)和情绪状态曲线(POMS)得分(MD =?-24.210,95%CI:?-30.740--?17.680; P = 0.000)拉莫三嗪组比对照组明显改善。对于POMS中的6种情绪状态,焦虑-焦虑评分(MD =?-3.360,95%CI:?-4.620-?-2.100; P = 0.000),抑郁-沮丧(MD =?-5.490,95% CI:?-7.420--3.560; P = 0.000),愤怒敌意(MD =?-3.870,95%CI:?-5.510-?-2.230; P = 0.000),疲劳惯性(MD =?-4.480) ,拉莫三嗪组的95%CI:?-5.630-?-3.320; P = 0.000),困惑困惑(MD =?-2.720、95%CI:?-3.730-?-1.720; P = 0.000)都显着活力指数(MD = 3.970,95%CI:2.870-5.070; P = 0.000)显着高于对照组。结论拉莫三嗪辅助治疗癫痫和抑郁症疗效良好。最常见的副作用包括皮疹和中枢神经系统刺激。 DOI:10.3969 / j.issn.1672-6731.2016.01.005

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号