...
首页> 外文期刊>Chinese journal of cancer >Weekly taxane–anthracycline combination regimen versus tri-weekly anthracycline-based regimen for the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Weekly taxane–anthracycline combination regimen versus tri-weekly anthracycline-based regimen for the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial

机译:每周紫杉烷-蒽环类药物联合方案与三​​周基于蒽环类药物的方案治疗局部晚期乳腺癌的随机对照试验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BackgroundExtensive studies have confirmed the efficacy of taxanes in combination with anthracycline-based chemotherapy on breast cancer. However, few studies have assessed the efficacy of weekly taxane–anthracycline regimens on locally advanced breast cancer. This study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a weekly taxane–anthracycline regimen with those of tri-weekly anthracycline-based regimen in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. MethodsPatients with locally advanced breast cancer were randomized to receive 4–6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with tri-weekly 5-fluorouracil–epirubicin–cyclophosphamide (FEC) regimen or weekly paclitaxel–epirubicin (PE) regimen. The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Other endpoints included the clinical tumor response, breast-conserving surgery rate, and adverse events. ResultsBetween March 2010 and September 2013, 293 patients were randomized to the FEC ( n =?151) and PE ( n =?142) arms. The overall clinical response rate was significantly higher in the PE arm than in the FEC arm (76.06% vs. 59.95%, P =?0.001). Consistently, the post-chemotherapy pathologic T and N stages were significantly lower in the PE arm than in the FEC arm ( P P =?0.665). Overall, 36 (27.27%) patients in the FEC arm and 6 (35.28%) in the PE arm were qualified for breast-conserving surgery. Most adverse events were comparable in both arms, with more severe neutropenia in the PE arm than in the FEC arm (11.97% vs. 5.96%, P =?0.031). ConclusionsIn patients with locally advanced breast cancer, weekly PE was not superior to FEC in terms of pCR. However, weekly PE has a higher response rate and superior down-staging effects. On this account, the PE regimen may be considered an alternative option for locally advanced breast cancer. Long-term follow-up data are needed to confirm the efficacy of this regimen on locally advanced breast cancer. Trial registration Chinese clinical trial registry, ChiCTR-TRC-10001043, September 21, 2014
机译:背景广泛的研究已经证实紫杉烷类药物与蒽环类药物联合化疗对乳腺癌的疗效。但是,很少有研究评估每周紫杉烷-蒽环类疗法对局部晚期乳腺癌的疗效。这项研究的目的是比较每周紫杉烷-蒽环类方案与三周基于蒽环类方案的方案在局部晚期乳腺癌患者中的疗效和安全性。方法将局部晚期乳腺癌患者随机分为4-6个周期的新辅助化疗方案,每三周一次接受5-氟尿嘧啶-厄比霉素-环磷酰胺(FEC)方案或每周一次紫杉醇-阿霉素(PE)方案。主要终点是病理完全缓解(pCR)率。其他终点包括临床肿瘤反应,保乳手术率和不良事件。结果在2010年3月至2013年9月之间,将293例患者随机分为FEC组(n =?151)和PE组(n =?142)。 PE组的总体临床反应率显着高于FEC组(76.06%对59.95%,P = 0.001)。一致地,PE组的化疗后病理T和N期明显低于FEC组(P P =?0.665)。总体上,FEC组中有36名(27.27%)患者,PE组中有6名(35.28%)患者符合保乳手术的条件。两组的大多数不良反应相当,PE组的中性粒细胞减少症比FEC组更严重(11.97%对5.96%,P =?0.031)。结论在局部晚期乳腺癌患者中,每周的PE在pCR方面不优于FEC。但是,每周的PE具有较高的响应率和出色的降级效果。因此,PE方案可能被认为是局部晚期乳腺癌的另一种选择。需要长期的随访数据以证实该方案对局部晚期乳腺癌的疗效。试用注册中国临床试验注册,ChiCTR-TRC-10001043,2014年9月21日

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号