...
首页> 外文期刊>Bangladesh Journal of Medical Biochemistry >Comparison of Conventionally Measured Serum Bicarbonate Values with Bicarbonate Values Obtained in Arterial and Venous Blood Gas Analysis
【24h】

Comparison of Conventionally Measured Serum Bicarbonate Values with Bicarbonate Values Obtained in Arterial and Venous Blood Gas Analysis

机译:常规测量的血清碳酸氢盐值与在动脉和静脉血气分析中获得的碳酸氢盐值的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Bicarbonate (HCO3-) measurement in serum or plasma from a sample of venous blood is routinely practiced in hospital patient management. HCO3- status can also be assumed from Blood gas analysis requiring arterial blood as sample which is cumbersome for both patients and doctors. This study was undertaken to evaluate the extent of agreement among biocarbonate values obtained during venous, arterial blood gas analysis and conventionally measured serum bicarbonate levels in a group of intensive care unit (ICU) patients to determine whether conventionally measured serum HCO3- (from peripheral venous blood) and calculated HCO3-values (from arterial blood gas [ABG] analyzers) can be used interchangeably. A total of 51 adult patients with diverse medical conditions, presenting at a tertiary health centre ICU were enrolled in this study when deemed by the treating physician to have an ABG analysis. Arterial and venous samples were taken as close in time as possible for blood gas analysis and routine blood tests. Bland-Altman analyses were used to compare the three methods. The HCO3- levels from ABG, Venous Blood gas (VBG) and tconventionally measured serum HCO3- showed acceptably narrow 95% limits of agreement using the Bland-Altman method. VBG reveals higher level of agreement with the ABG bicarbonate values compared to measured serum HCO3-. Thus, venous blood can be an alternate for arterial blood where ABG analyzer is available. conventionaly serum HCO3- measurements can also be useful and used as substitute for an expensive ABG analyzer in resource constrained health care sectors when required. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjmb.v5i1.13425 Bangladesh J Med Biochem 2012; 5(1): 12-15
机译:医院患者管理中通常采用血清或血浆中静脉血中碳酸氢盐(HCO3-)的测量方法。还可以从需要用动脉血作为样本的血气分析中假设HCO3-的状态,这对患者和医生而言都很麻烦。这项研究的目的是评估一组重症监护病房(ICU)患者在静脉,动脉血气分析期间获得的生物碳酸盐值与常规测定的血清碳酸氢盐水平之间的一致性程度,以确定是否常规测定的血清HCO3-(来自外周静脉)血液)和计算出的HCO3值(来自动脉血气[ABG]分析仪)可以互换使用。当主治医师认为其具有ABG分析时,共有51位在第三级健康中心ICU中就医的成人患者参加了这项研究。尽可能及时地采集动脉和静脉样本,以进行血气分析和常规血液检查。使用Bland-Altman分析来比较这三种方法。使用Bland-Altman方法,ABG,静脉血气(VBG)和常规测定的血清HCO3-的HCO3-水平显示出95%的可接受的窄一致限。与测定的血清HCO3-相比,VBG显示出与ABG碳酸氢盐值更高的一致性水平。因此,在可以使用ABG分析仪的情况下,静脉血可以替代动脉血。常规上,血清HCO3-的测定也很有用,并在需要时可替代资源受限的医疗保健领域中昂贵的ABG分析仪。 DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjmb.v5i1.13425 Bangladesh J Med Biochem 2012; 5(1):12-15

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号