首页> 外文期刊>Chinese Journal of Contemporary Neurology and Neurosurgery >Effect of Glasgow Coma Scale on the choice of treatment strategy in acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage
【24h】

Effect of Glasgow Coma Scale on the choice of treatment strategy in acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage

机译:格拉斯哥昏迷量表对急性高血压脑出血治疗策略选择的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To investigate the effect of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on the choice of treatment strategy in acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods Among 286 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, 186 patients underwent operation. According to GCS scores on admission, 186 cases included 94 cases of GCS 5-8, 71 cases of GCS 9-11 and 21 cases of GCS 12-14. These patients respectively underwent hematoma clearance and decompressive craniotomy (N = 63, 22.03%), hematoma clearance (N = 21, 7.34%), trepanation and drainage or external ventricular drainage (N = 102, 35.66%). The rest (N = 100) underwent conservative treatment, including 25 cases of GCS 5-8, 27 cases of GCS 9-11, 25 cases of GCS 12-14 and 23 cases of GCS 15. Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was used to evaluate curative effect after 3-6 months follow-up. Results The proportion of GOS in GCS 5-8 group was 14 cases (11.76%) of Grade 1, 21 cases (17.65%) of Grade 2, 39 cases (32.77%) of Grade 3, 22 cases (18.49%) of Grade 4 and 17 cases (14.29%) of Grade 5, except 6 lost cases (5.04%). The proportion of GOS in GCS 9-11 group was 6 cases (6.12%) of Grade 1, 2 cases (2.04%) of Grade 2, 6 cases (6.12%) of Grade 3, 48 cases (48.98%) of Grade 4 and 34 cases (34.69%) of Grade 5, except 2 lost cases (2.04%). The proportion of GOS in GCS 12-14 group was 15 cases (32.61%) of Grade 4 and 31 cases (67.39%) of Grade 5. The proportion of GOS in GCS 15 group was one case (4.35%) of Grade 4 and 22 cases (95.65%) of Grade 5. Differences between groups had statistical significance ( χ 2 = 142.966, P = 0.000). Conclusions The prognosis of patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage is positively related to GCS score on admission. The higher the GCS score is, the higher the GOS grade will be. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2017.03.011
机译:目的探讨格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)对急性高血压脑出血治疗策略选择的影响。方法对286例高血压脑出血患者中的186例进行手术治疗。根据入院时的GCS评分,有186例包括94例GCS 5-8、71例GCS 9-11和21例GCS 12-14。这些患者分别接受了血肿清除和开颅减压术(N = 63,22.03%),血肿清除率(N = 21,7.34%),骨和引流或室性引流(N = 102,35.66%)。其余(N = 100)接受了保守治疗,包括25例GCS 5-8、27例GCS 9-11、25例GCS 12-14和23例GCS15。使用格拉斯哥成果量表(GOS)评估3-6个月随访后的疗效。结果GCS 5-8组中GOS的比例为1级14例(11.76%),2级21例(17.65%),3级39例(32.77%),22级22.%(18.49%) 5级中有4例和17例(14.29%),丢失的6例(5.04%)。 GCS 9-11组中GOS的比例为1级6例(6.12%),2级2例(2.04%),3级6例(6.12%),4级48例(48.98%) 5级34例(34.69%),丢失的2例(2.04%)除外。 GCS 12-14组中GOS的比例为4级的15例(32.61%)和5级的31例(67.39%)。GCS 15组的GOS的比例为4级的1例(4.35%)。 5级22例(95.65%)。两组之间的差异具有统计学意义(χ2 = 142.966,P = 0.000)。结论高血压脑出血患者的预后与入院时GCS评分呈正相关。 GCS分数越高,GOS等级越高。 DOI:10.3969 / j.issn.1672-6731.2017.03.011

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号