...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research >Comparison of different methods for diagnosis of porcine proliferative enteropathy
【24h】

Comparison of different methods for diagnosis of porcine proliferative enteropathy

机译:猪增生性肠病不同诊断方法的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

The objectives of this study were: (1) to compare 2 methods of serology; (2) to compare 3 histologic techniques; and (3) to compare 2 methods of detecting shedding in pigs experimentally challenged with Lawsonia intracellularis. The sensitivities of these tests were determined by the detection of infection. Forty 5-week-old pigs were inoculated on day 0 with intestinal homogenate from pigs with proliferative enteropathy (PE). Clinical evaluation was done on day 7 and daily from day 14 to 28 postinoculation. Fecal shedding of L. intracellularis was monitored by use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis and immunoperoxidase staining at 7-day intervals. Serum was obtained on days 0 and 28 for serologic testing by glass slide and tissue culture indirect fluorescent antibody tests. At euthanasia on day 28, gross intestinal lesions were evaluated and ileum samples collected for histologic analyses. Ileal histologic sections from each animal were stained by hematoxylin and eosin, Warthin-Starry silver stain, and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Of the 40 pigs, 36 had gross lesions typical of PE at necropsy. The percentage of agreement between the 2 serologic methods was 94.4%. Immunoperoxidase stain of fecal smears was more sensitive than PCR for detecting fecal shedding, especially on day 21 (89.5% and 60.5%, respectively) and day 28 (59.4% and 37.5%, respectively) post-inoculation. The IHC stain was much more sensitive for detecting infection than the routinely used hematoxylin and eosin and Warthin-Starry silver stains. In conclusion, in experimentally infected pigs, both serologic methods were appropriate techniques for detecting infection. For fecal samples, PCR has low sensitivity. Immunohistochemistry is the best diagnostic tool for formalin-fixed samples.
机译:这项研究的目的是:(1)比较两种血清学方法; (2)比较3种组织学技术; (3)比较2种检测细胞内劳森菌攻击的猪的脱落的方法。这些测试的敏感性通过检测感染来确定。在第0天,对40只5周大的猪接种增生性肠病(PE)猪的肠匀浆。接种后第7天和第14至28天每天进行临床评估。通过使用聚合酶链反应(PCR)分析和免疫过氧化物酶染色,每隔7天监测一次胞内劳森菌的粪便脱落情况。在第0天和第28天获得血清用于通过载玻片和组织培养间接荧光抗体测试进行血清学测试。在第28天的安乐死时,对肠道总体病变进行评估,并收集回肠样品进行组织学分析。用苏木精和曙红,Warthin-Starry银染和免疫组织化学(IHC)对每只动物的回肠组织学切片进行染色。在40只猪中,有36只在尸检时有典型的PE肉眼病变。两种血清学方法之间的一致性百分比为94.4%。粪便涂片的免疫过氧化物酶染色比PCR更灵敏,尤其是在接种后第21天(分别为89.5%和60.5%)和第28天(分别为59.4%和37.5%)。 IHC染色比常规使用的苏木精和曙红和Warthin-Starry银染色对感染的检测更为敏感。总之,在实验感染的猪中,两种血清学方法都是检测感染的合适技术。对于粪便样品,PCR灵敏度低。免疫组织化学是福尔马林固定样品的最佳诊断工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号