...
首页> 外文期刊>Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra >A Comparison of Stent Implant versus Medical Treatment for Severe Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis: A Controlled Clinical Trial
【24h】

A Comparison of Stent Implant versus Medical Treatment for Severe Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis: A Controlled Clinical Trial

机译:严重症状性颅内狭窄的支架植入与药物治疗的比较:对照临床试验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Atherosclerotic stenosis of the major intracranial arteries is the most common cause of ischemic stroke. There are limited treatments for severe intracranial stenosis, and stent placement versus medical treatment remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare functional outcomes of these two modalities in patients with severe symptomatic intracranial stenosis. Methods: At a single center, between 2008 and 2011, patients with angiographically demonstrated severe (70–90%) symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis were divided into two groups: group A, which received only medical treatment, and group B, which underwent endovascular stent implant treatment. The severity and location of the stenosis was determined by digital subtraction angiography and the Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) trial criteria in all patients. The exclusion criteria were: specific causes other than atherosclerosis, such as artery dissection, fibromuscular dysplasia, vasculitis, radiation and intracranial hemorrhage, focal neurological deficit that did not correlate to internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery stenosis. All procedures were done under light anesthesia. Technical success was defined as the reduction of stenosis to 30 days) adverse events, including stroke, myocardial infarction and death, was 1 (2.9%) and 6 (20.7%) in the stent implant and medical groups, respectively (p = 0.042). The stent implant group had significantly better favorable functional outcomes according to the mRS than the medical group (93.9 vs. 63.0%). The cumulative secondary adverse event-free survival was significantly lower in the stent implant group. Conclusion: Stent implants can be considered more durable and safe for patients with symptomatic severe stenosis of the internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery, despite optimal medical therapy. Randomized, multicenter trials are required to confirm these results.
机译:背景:主要颅内动脉的动脉粥样硬化狭窄是缺血性中风的最常见原因。严重颅内狭窄的治疗方法有限,支架置入与药物治疗之间仍存在争议。这项研究的目的是比较两种症状严重颅内狭窄患者的功能结果。方法:在2008年至2011年的一个中心,将有血管造影表现的严重(70-90%)症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化患者分为两组:A组仅接受药物治疗,B组接受血管内支架植入术治疗。通过数字减影血管造影和华法林-阿司匹林症状性颅内疾病(WASID)试验标准确定狭窄的严重程度和位置。排除标准为:动脉粥样硬化以外的特定原因,例如动脉夹层,纤维肌发育异常,血管炎,放射线和颅内出血,与颈内动脉或大脑中动脉狭窄无关的局灶性神经功能缺损。所有程序均在轻度麻醉下进行。技术成功的定义是将支架植入物组和医疗组的不良事件(包括中风,心肌梗死和死亡)减少到30天)分别为1(2.9%)和6(20.7%)(p = 0.042) 。根据mRS,支架植入物组具有比医疗组明显更好的有利功能结局(93.9%对63.0%)。支架植入物组的累积继发性无不良事件生存期显着降低。结论:尽管有最佳的药物治疗方法,对于有症状的颈内动脉或大脑中动脉严重狭窄的患者,支架植入物仍被认为更耐用,更安全。需要进行随机的多中心试验以确认这些结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号