首页> 外文期刊>Challenges in Sustainability >The Pitfalls of Sustainability Policies: Insights into Plural Sustainabilities
【24h】

The Pitfalls of Sustainability Policies: Insights into Plural Sustainabilities

机译:可持续发展政策的陷阱:多元可持续发展的见解

获取原文
       

摘要

A lot can be learned from the numerous pitfalls of sustainable development implementation: they outline how collective representation, short term interests and balance of power can undermine sustainability. For instance, the usefulness of global institutions in dealing with sustainable development is questionable as most are skewed toward the interests and perceptions of developed countries. The notion of sustainable development itself induces a profound cleavage between academic authors and the actors of its implementation, some of whom confuse it with sustainable growth (which favors spatial equity), whilst the others with environment management (which favors intergenerational equity). This polarization is a real problem, since originally, "Our Common Future" report promotes an inclusive approach, able to cope with both equities simultaneously. Finally, if there are obligations toward future generations, there are also obligations toward the current generation. The key issue for effective sustainability policies should be making them acceptable to everyone by including the expectations of local societies and communities. As a matter of consequence, universal solutions do not exist. They would not meet the specificities of local circumstances. The traditional prescriptive sustainable development model should give way to flexible plural sustainabilities. Singular, top-down, global-to-local approaches to sustainable development should be substituted for multiple sustainabilities.
机译:从实施可持续发展的众多陷阱中可以学到很多东西:它们概述了集体代表制,短期利益和力量平衡如何破坏可持续性。例如,全球机构在处理可持续发展方面的有用性值得怀疑,因为大多数机构都偏向于发达国家的利益和看法。可持续发展的概念本身引起了学术作者和执行主体之间的深刻分歧,其中一些人将其与可持续增长(有利于空间公平)相混淆,而另一些人将环境管理与环境(有利于代际公平)相混淆。这种两极分化是一个真正的问题,因为最初,“我们共同的未来”报告提倡一种包容性的方法,能够同时应对两种股票。最后,如果对子孙后代有义务,对当代人也有义务。有效的可持续性政策的关键问题应该是通过纳入地方社会和社区的期望,使每个人都接受这些政策。因此,不存在通用解决方案。他们不符合当地情况的特殊性。传统的规定性可持续发展模式应让位于灵活的多元可持续性。应当采用单一,自上而下的,从全球到本地的可持续发展方法来替代多种可持续性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号