首页> 外文期刊>Ceylon Medical Journal >The fetal acoustic stimulation test: a reliable and cost effective method of antepartum fetal monitoring
【24h】

The fetal acoustic stimulation test: a reliable and cost effective method of antepartum fetal monitoring

机译:胎儿声刺激测试:一种可靠且经济高效的产前胎儿监护方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Rationale A healthy foetus, if exposed to external sound stimulation, often responds with vigorous movements which can be felt by the mother. A hypoxic foetus usually does not show this response. Objectives To evaluate the fetal acoustic stimulation test (FAST) in antepartum fetal monitoring. Design and Setting Prospective interventional study carried out at the Teaching Hospital, Galle. Method An initial non-stress test (NST) followed by a FAST using the Corometric TM model 146 was carried out in 423 high risk pregnant women. The response to FAST was assessed and compared with the NST. A repeat NST was recorded in women who had an initial non-reactive NST. The results of the NST and FAST were compared with the fetal outcome if the woman delivered within 24 hours. Outcome measures Maternal perception of fetal movements after FAST, results of NST before and after FAST, and the babies' 5 minute Apgar scores if delivered within 24 hours of the FAST. Results Of the women, 349 ( 82.5 %) noticed fetal movements after FAST. Of the 167 women who complained of absent or reduced fetal movements, 67% felt fetal movements after FAST. Ninety one had a nonreactive NST and 43 (47 %) became reactive after FAST. Compared to the NST, the FAST had less sensitivity ( 93 % vs 100 %, p = 0.01 ), better specificity ( 79 % vs 45 %, p = 0.001 ), better positive predictive value ( 67 % vs 50 %, p = 0.02 ), similar negative predictive values ( 96 % vs 100 %, p > 0.05 ) and better accuracy ( 83% vs 69% , p = 0.03) in predicting neonatal asphyxia ( 5 minute Apgar score Conclusion The FAST is a reliable, cost effective screening test for antepartum fetal monitoring. It significantly reduces the false positive (non-reactive ) NST and has a good negative predictive value. Key words: Apgar scores; sensitivity; specificity and accuracy DOI: 10.4038/cmj.v50i4.1406 Ceylon Medical Journal Vol.50(4) 2005: 156-159
机译:基本原理健康的胎儿,如果受到外界声音的刺激,通常会做出剧烈的运动,而母亲会感觉到这种运动。缺氧胎儿通常不显示这种反应。目的评估产前胎儿监测中的胎儿声刺激测试(FAST)。设计和设置前瞻性干预研究在加勒的教学医院进行。方法在423名高危孕妇中进行了初始无压力测试(NST),然后使用Corometric TM 146型进行了FAST。评估对FAST的反应并将其与NST进行比较。最初患有非反应性NST的女性重复NST。如果妇女在24小时内分娩,则将NST和FAST的结果与胎儿结局进行比较。结果衡量母亲在FAST后对胎儿运动的感知,FAST前后的NST结果以及婴儿在FAST 24小时之内的5分钟Apgar评分。结果在这些妇女中,有349例(占82.5 %)在FAST后发现了胎儿运动。在167名抱怨胎儿运动缺乏或减少的妇女中,有67%的人在FAST后感到胎儿运动。九十一名患者的NST无反应,FAST后有43名(47%)开始发生反应。与NST相比,FAST的敏感性较低(93%vs 100%,p = 0.01),特异性更高(79%vs 45%,p = 0.001),阳性预测值更好(67%vs 50) %,p = 0.02),相似的阴性预测值(96 %vs 100 %,p> 0.05)和更好的准确性(83 %vs 69 %,p = 0.03)在预测新生儿窒息(5分钟Apgar评分)结论FAST是一种可靠,具有成本效益的产前胎儿监护筛查测试,可显着减少假阳性(非反应性)NST,并具有良好的阴性预测价值关键词:Apgar评分;敏感性;特异性和准确性DOI:10.4038 /cmj.v50i4.1406锡兰医学杂志Vol.50(4)2005:156-159

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号