...
首页> 外文期刊>Big Data & Society >Digital subjectivation and financial markets: Criticizing Social Studies of Finance with Lazzarato
【24h】

Digital subjectivation and financial markets: Criticizing Social Studies of Finance with Lazzarato

机译:数字主观化与金融市场:与拉扎拉托批评金融社会学

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The recently rising field of Critical Data Studies is still facing fundamental questions. Among these is the enigma of digital subjectivation. Who are the subjects of Big Data? A field where this question is particularly pressing is finance. Since the 1990s traders have been steadily integrated into computerized data assemblages, which calls for an ontology that eliminates the distinction between human sovereign subjects and non-human instrumental objects. The latter subjectivize traders in pre-conscious ways, because human consciousness runs too slow to follow the volatility of the market. In response to this conundrum Social Studies of Finance has drawn on Actor-Network Theory to interpret financial markets as technically constructed networks of human and non-human actors. I argue that in order to develop an explicitly critical data study it might be advantageous to refer to Maurizio Lazzarato?¢????s theory of machinic subjugation instead. Although both accounts describe financial digital subjectivation similarly, Lazzarato has the advantage of coupling his description to a clear critique of and resistance to finance.
机译:最近兴起的关键数据研究领域仍面临基本问题。其中有数字主观的谜。谁是大数据的主题?这个问题特别紧迫的领域是金融。自1990年代以来,交易者已稳定地集成到计算机化数据组合中,这就需要一种本体论,以消除人类主权主体与非人类工具客体之间的区别。后者以前意识方式使交易者主体化,因为人类意识运行太慢而无法跟随市场的波动。为了应对这一难题,金融社会研究利用行为者网络理论将金融市场解释为技术上由人类和非人类行为者组成的网络。我认为,为了进行明确的关键数据研究,最好参考Maurizio Lazzarato的机器征服理论。尽管两个帐户都类似地描述了金融数字主体,但拉扎拉托具有将其描述与对金融的清晰批判和抵抗相结合的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号