首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular Diabetology >Impact of intravenous exenatide infusion for perioperative blood glucose control on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injuries after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: sub study of the phase II/III ExSTRESS randomized trial
【24h】

Impact of intravenous exenatide infusion for perioperative blood glucose control on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injuries after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: sub study of the phase II/III ExSTRESS randomized trial

机译:艾塞那肽静脉输注对围手术期血糖控制对冠状动脉搭桥手术后心肌缺血-再灌注损伤的影响:ExSTRESS II / III期随机试验的子研究

获取原文
           

摘要

The aim of the study was to investigate whether intravenous (iv) infusion of exenatide, a synthetic GLP-1 receptor agonist, could provide a protective effect against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. A sub study analysis of patients ?18?years admitted for elective CABG and included in the ExSTRESS trial was conducted. Patients were randomized to receive either iv exenatide (1-h bolus of 0.05?μg?min?1 followed by a constant infusion of 0.025?μg?min?1) (exenatide group) or iv insulin therapy (control group) for blood glucose control (target range 100–139?mg?dl?1) during the first 48?h after surgical incision. All serum levels of troponin I measured during routine care in the Cardiac Surgery ICU were recorded. The primary outcome was the highest value of plasma concentration of troponin I measured between 12 and 24?h after ICU admission. The proportion of patients presenting an echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ?50% at the follow-up consultation was compared between the two groups. Finally, 43 and 49 patients were analyzed in the control and exenatide groups, respectively {age: 69 [61–76] versus 71 [63–75] years; baseline LVEF??50%: 6 (14%) versus 16 (32%) patients; on-pump surgery: 29 (67%) versus 33 (67%) patients}. The primary outcome did not significantly differ between the two groups (3.34 [1.06–6.19] μg?l?1 versus 2.64 [1.29–3.85] μg?l?1 in the control and exenatide groups, respectively; mean difference (MD) [95% confidence interval (95% CI)] 0.16 [??0.25; 0.57], p?=?0.54). The highest troponin value measured during the first 72?h in the ICU was 6.34 [1.36–10.90] versus 5.04 [2.39–7.18] μg?l?1, in the control and exenatide groups respectively (MD [95% CI] 0.20 [??0.22; 0.61], p?=?0.39). At the follow-up consultation, 5 (12%) versus 8 (16%) patients presented a LVEF??50% in the control and in the exenatide groups respectively (relative risk [95% CI] 0.68 [0.16; 2.59], p?=?0.56). Postoperative iv exenatide did not provide any additional cardioprotective effect compared to iv insulin in low-risk patients undergoing scheduled CABG surgery.
机译:这项研究的目的是调查静脉内(iv)输注艾塞那肽(一种合成的GLP-1受体激动剂)是否可以对冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)术后的心肌缺血-再灌注损伤提供保护作用。对入选CABG≥18岁并纳入ExSTRESS试验的患者进行了一项子研究分析。患者被随机分为静脉艾塞那肽(1小时推注0.05?μg?min?1,然后持续输注0.025?μg?min?1)(艾塞那肽组)或静脉胰岛素治疗(对照组)手术切口后的第一个48小时内保持控制(目标范围100-139?mg?dl?1)。记录在心脏外科重症监护病房(ICU)进行常规护理期间测得的所有肌钙蛋白I血清水平。主要结果是ICU入院后12至24小时内测得的肌钙蛋白I的血浆最高值。比较两组在随访时表现出超声心动图左室射血分数(LVEF)> 50%的患者比例。最后,分别在对照组和艾塞那肽组中分析了43例和49例患者[年龄:69 [61-76]岁和71 [63-75]岁; LVEF基线<?50%:6(14%)对16(32%)患者;泵上手术:29(67%)比33(67%)患者}。两组之间的主要结局无显着差异(对照组和艾塞那肽组分别为3.34 [1.06-6.19]μg?l?1与2.64 [1.29-3.85]μg?l?1;平均差(MD)[ 95%置信区间(95%CI)= 0.16 [Δ0.25; 0.57],p = 0.54)。在对照组和艾塞那肽组中,ICU的前72小时内测得的最高肌钙蛋白值分别为6.34 [1.36-10.90]和5.04 [2.39-7.18]μg?l?1(MD [95%CI] 0.20 [ Δθ= 0.22; 0.61],p≤0.39)。在随访期间,对照组和艾塞那肽组分别有5例(12%)对8例(16%)的患者LVEF≤50%(相对危险度[95%CI] 0.68 [0.16; 2.59] ,p≤0.56)。与接受静脉内胰岛素治疗的低风险患者相比,术后静脉注射艾塞那肽与静脉注射胰岛素相比没有提供任何额外的心脏保护作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号