...
首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular Diabetology >Comparative effect of olmesartan and candesartan on lipid metabolism and renal function in patients with hypertension: a retrospective observational study
【24h】

Comparative effect of olmesartan and candesartan on lipid metabolism and renal function in patients with hypertension: a retrospective observational study

机译:奥美沙坦和坎地沙坦对高血压患者脂质代谢和肾功能的比较作用:一项回顾性观察研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), including olmesartan and candesartan, are widely used antihypertensive agents. Many clinical studies have demonstrated that ARBs have organ-protecting effects, e.g., cardioprotection, vasculoprotection and renoprotection. However, the effect of prolonged olmesartan monotherapy on lipid metabolism in patients with hypertension is less well studied. We performed a retrospective observational study to compare the effects of olmesartan with those of candesartan, focusing on lipid metabolism and renal function. Methods We used data from the Clinical Data Warehouse of Nihon University School of Medicine obtained between Nov 1, 2004 and Feb 28, 2011, to identify cohorts of new olmesartan users (n = 168) and candesartan users (n = 266). We used propensity-score weighting to adjust for differences in all covariates (age, sex, comorbid diseases, previous drugs) between olmesartan and candesartan users, and compared serum chemical data including serum triglyceride (TG), LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), potassium, creatinine and urea nitrogen. The mean exposure of olmesartan and candesartan users was 126.1 and 122.8 days, respectively. Results After adjustment, there were no statistically significant differences in all covariates between olmesartan and candesartan users. The mean age was 60.7 and 61.0 years, and 33.4% and 33.7% of olmesartan and candesartan users were women, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in mean values for all laboratory tests between baseline and during the exposure period in both olmesartan and candesartan users. In olmesartan users, the reduction of serum TG level was significant in comparison with that in candesartan users. Other parameters of lipid profile and renal function showed no statistically significant difference in the change from baseline to during the exposure period between olmesartan and candesartan users. Conclusions In this study, we observed a more beneficial effect on lipid metabolism, a reduction of serum TG, with olmesartan monotherapy than with candesartan monotherapy. However, there were no clinically significant changes in the levels of all test parameters between baseline and during the exposure period with both drugs. These results suggest that the influence of olmesartan or candesartan monotherapy on lipid metabolism and renal function is small, and that they can be safely used in patients with hypertension.
机译:背景技术包括奥美沙坦和坎地沙坦的血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)是广泛使用的降压药。许多临床研究表明ARB具有器官保护作用,例如心脏保护,血管保护和肾脏保护。但是,长期奥美沙坦单一疗法对高血压患者脂质代谢的影响研究较少。我们进行了一项回顾性观察性研究,比较了奥美沙坦和坎地沙坦的作用,重点是脂质代谢和肾功能。方法我们使用了来自日本大学医学院临床数据仓库(2004年11月1日至2011年2月28日)的数据,以识别新的奥美沙坦使用者(n = 168)和坎地沙坦使用者(n = 266)的队列。我们使用倾向评分加权来调整奥美沙坦和坎地沙坦使用者之间所有协变量(年龄,性别,合并症,以前的药物)的差异,并比较了血清化学数据,包括血清甘油三酸酯(TG),低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C) ,总胆固醇(TC),钾,肌酐和尿素氮。奥美沙坦和坎地沙坦使用者的平均暴露分别为126.1天和122.8天。结果调整后,奥美沙坦和坎地沙坦使用者之间所有协变量之间均无统计学差异。平均年龄为60.7岁和61.0岁,奥美沙坦和坎地沙坦的使用者分别为33.4%和33.7%。在奥美沙坦和坎地沙坦使用者中,基线和暴露期间所有实验室检查的平均值均无统计学显着性差异。在奥美沙坦使用者中,与坎地沙坦使用者相比,血清TG水平的降低是显着的。奥美沙坦和坎地沙坦使用者之间,从脂质水平和肾功能的其他参数显示,从基线到暴露期的变化在统计学上无显着差异。结论在这项研究中,我们观察到奥美沙坦单一疗法比坎地沙坦单一疗法对脂质代谢,降低血清TG更有益。但是,在两种药物的基线之间和暴露期间,所有测试参数的水平都没有临床上的显着变化。这些结果表明,奥美沙坦或坎地沙坦单药治疗对脂质代谢和肾功能的影响很小,可以安全地用于高血压患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号