首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral and Brain Functions >Evidence for impulsivity in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat drawn from complementary response-withholding tasks
【24h】

Evidence for impulsivity in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat drawn from complementary response-withholding tasks

机译:从补充性的反应保留任务中获得的自发性高血压大鼠冲动的证据

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The inability to inhibit reinforced responses is a defining feature of ADHD associated with impulsivity. The Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat (SHR) has been extolled as an animal model of ADHD, but there is no clear experimental evidence of inhibition deficits in SHR. Attempts to demonstrate these deficits may have suffered from methodological and analytical limitations. Methods We provide a rationale for using two complementary response-withholding tasks to doubly dissociate impulsivity from motivational and motor processes. In the lever-holding task (LHT), continual lever depression was required for a minimum interval. Under a differential reinforcement of low rates schedule (DRL), a minimum interval was required between lever presses. Both tasks were studied using SHR and two normotensive control strains, Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) and Long Evans (LE), over an overlapping range of intervals (1 – 5 s for LHT and 5 – 60 s for DRL). Lever-holding and DRL performance was characterized as the output of a mixture of two processes, timing and iterative random responding; we call this account of response inhibition the Temporal Regulation (TR) model. In the context of TR, impulsivity was defined as a bias toward premature termination of the timed intervals. Results The TR model provided an accurate description of LHT and DRL performance. On the basis of TR parameter estimates, SHRs were more impulsive than LE rats across tasks and target times. WKY rats produced substantially shorter timed responses in the lever-holding task than in DRL, suggesting a motivational or motor deficit. The precision of timing by SHR, as measured by the variance of their timed intervals, was excellent, flouting expectations from ADHD research. Conclusion This research validates the TR model of response inhibition and supports SHR as an animal model of ADHD-related impulsivity. It indicates, however, that SHR's impulse-control deficit is not caused by imprecise timing. The use of ad hoc impulsivity metrics and of WKY as control strain for SHR impulsivity are called into question.
机译:背景技术不能抑制增强反应是与冲动相关的ADHD的特征。自发性高血压大鼠(SHR)已被誉为多动症的动物模型,但尚无明确的实验证据可抑制SHR的抑制缺陷。试图证明这些缺陷的方法可能受到方法和分析方面的限制。方法我们提供了使用两个互补的保留反应任务来将冲动与动机和运动过程双重分离的理论基础。在操纵杆保持任务(LHT)中,需要连续按下操纵杆并保持最小间隔。在低费率时间表(DRL)的不同强化下,两次压杆之间需要一个最小间隔。使用SHR和两个血压正常控制菌株Wistar-Kyoto(WKY)和Long Evans(LE),在重叠的时间间隔范围内(LHT为1 – 5 s,DRL为5 – 60 s)研究了这两项任务。持杆和DRL性能的特征是定时和迭代随机响应这两个过程的混合输出。我们称这种对反应抑制的解释为时间调节(TR)模型。在TR的背景下,冲动被定义为对定时间隔提前终止的偏见。结果TR模型提供了LHT和DRL性能的准确描述。根据TR参数估计,在任务和目标时间范围内,SHR比LE大鼠更具冲动性。 WKY大鼠在握杆任务中产生的计时响应比在DRL中产生的短得多,这提示了动机或运动缺陷。通过SHR计时的精度(通过计时间隔的方差来衡量)非常好,超出了ADHD研究的期望。结论这项研究验证了反应抑制的TR模型,并支持SHR作为ADHD相关冲动的动物模型。但是,这表明SHR的冲动控制不足不是由不正确的时间引起的。使用临时冲量度量和WKY作为SHR冲量的控制应变受到质疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号