首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Management and Research >Comparative efficacy of different targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer following progression on prior endocrine therapy: a network meta-analysis
【24h】

Comparative efficacy of different targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer following progression on prior endocrine therapy: a network meta-analysis

机译:先前内分泌治疗进展后,不同靶向疗法加氟维司群对晚期乳腺癌的疗效比较:网络荟萃分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to indirectly compare the efficacy of different targeted agents with fulvestrant for patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC) following progression on prior endocrine therapy. Methods: The titles/abstracts were searched from the PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases for RCTs to evaluate the efficacy of palbociclib plus fulvestrant vs alternative targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for postmenopausal HR+/HER2– ABC following progression on prior endocrine therapy. In addition, the primary measured outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate. The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) value of each treatment was calculated to achieve the best ranking for each treatment. Results: A total of 11 studies, including 4,178 patients in the network meta-analysis, were included and analyzed. In terms of the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS, palbociclib plus fulvestrant was superior to other target agents plus fulvestrant (HR=0.62, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.40–0.96; HR=0.62, 95% CrI: 0.47–0.96; for pictilisib plus fulvestrant and buparlisib plus fulvestrant, respectively). Ribociclib plus fulvestrant has no difference in abemaciclib plus fulvestrant and palbociclib plus fulvestrant (HR =1.02, 95% CrI =0.72–1.45; HR =1.22, 95% CrI =0.84–1.78). In terms of objective response rate, compared with placebo plus fulvestrant, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant, dovitinib plus fulvestrant, buparlisib plus fulvestrant, and palbociclib plus fulvestrant had a significant difference (odds ratio [OR] =2.84, 95% CrI =1.91– 4.31; OR =3.62, 95% CrI =1.21–12.48; OR =1.80, 95% CrI =1.25–2.60; and OR =2.52, 95% CrI =1.43– 4.72, respectively). Conclusion: According to the present study, palbociclib plus fulvestrant may be the optimal treatment for HR+/HER2– postmenopausal women with ABC after disease progression following endocrine therapy.
机译:背景:我们进行了一项随机对照试验(RCT)的网络荟萃分析,以间接比较不同靶向药物与氟维司群对激素受体阳性(HR +)和人类表皮生长因子受体2型阴性(HER2)患者的疗效–)先前内分泌治疗进展后的晚期乳腺癌(ABC)。方法:从PubMed,EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库中搜索标题/摘要以进行RCT,以评估帕波昔布联合氟维司群与替代靶向治疗加氟维司群对绝经后HR + / HER2-ABC的疗效,以评估先前的内分泌治疗的疗效。此外,主要测量结果是无进展生存期(PFS)和客观缓解率。计算每种处理的累积等级(SUCRA)值以下的表面,以实现每种处理的最佳等级。结果:共纳入和分析了11项研究,包括4178例网络荟萃分析患者。就PFS的合并危险比(HR)而言,palbociclib加氟维司群优于其他靶标药物加氟维司群(HR = 0.62,95%可信区间[CrI]:0.40–0.96; HR = 0.62,95%CrI:0.47 –0.96;分别用于吡非昔布加氟维司群和布帕西布加氟维司群)。 Ribociclib加氟维司群与abemaciclib加氟维司群和palbociclib加氟维司群无差异(HR = 1.02,95%CrI = 0.72-1.45; HR = 1.22,95%CrI = 0.84-1.78)。就客观反应率而言,与安慰剂加氟维司群,阿贝昔单抗加氟韦司坦,多维替尼加氟维司群,布帕西布加氟维司群,帕波西布利加氟维司群相比有显着性差异(优势比[OR] = 2.84,95%CrI = 1.91-4.31; OR = 3.62,95%CrI = 1.21–12.48; OR = 1.80,95%CrI = 1.25–2.60; OR = 2.52,95%CrI = 1.43-4.72)。结论:根据目前的研究,内分泌治疗后病情发展后,palbociclib加氟维司群可能是HR + / HER2绝经后ABC女性的最佳治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号