首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Management and Research >Comparison of outcomes of complete mesocolic excision with conventional radical resection performed by laparoscopic approach for right colon cancer
【24h】

Comparison of outcomes of complete mesocolic excision with conventional radical resection performed by laparoscopic approach for right colon cancer

机译:腹腔镜下完全结肠切除术与常规根治性切除术治疗右结肠癌的结果比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: This retrospective study compared the outcomes of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) guided by superior mesenteric artery with laparoscopic conventional radical resection (CRR) performed for right-sided colon cancer. Methods: Patients with right-sided colon cancer underwent CME (n=107; January 2011 to December 2015) or CRR (n=60; January 2008 to December 2010). Results: The 2 groups were comparable regarding age, gender, body mass index, maximum tumor diameter, and tumor stage. In the CME group, the distances between the tumor and the high vascular tie (HVT; 12.6?cm), and between the closest bowel wall and HVT (10.4±0.9?cm) was significantly greater than that of the CRR group (11.5?cm and 9.3±1.0?cm, respectively; P 0.001). In the CME group, the number of retrieved lymph nodes (23.2) was significantly higher, and the volume of intraoperative bleeding (108.4?mL) was less than that of the CRR (14.0 and 128.7?mL; P 0.001). The length of resected bowel in the 2 groups was similar (25.8±0.7?cm and 25.5±2.1?cm; P =0.106), as was the operative time, postoperative hospitalization, time of first bowel movement, and complications. The 3-year recurrence rate of the CME group (8.4%) was significantly lower than that of the CRR (20.0%), the 3-year overall survival was significantly higher (93.5% cf. 85.0%), and the survival rates of T4 stage, N1 stage, pTNM stage II, pTNM stage III and lympho vascular invasion were significantly higher ( P 0.05). The 2 groups were similar for survival rates of Tis, T1, T2, T3, N2 stage, pTNM stage I and perineural invasion ( P 0.05). Conclusion: CME for right-sided colon cancer guided by superior mesenteric artery has similar short-term outcomes, higher lymph node yield, and higher 3-year overall survival compared with CRR.
机译:背景:这项回顾性研究比较了由肠系膜上动脉引导的腹腔镜完全中肠切除术(CME)与右侧结肠癌的腹腔镜常规根治性切除术(CRR)的结果。方法:右侧结肠癌患者接受CME(n = 107; 2011年1月至2015年12月)或CRR(n = 60; 2008年1月至2010年12月)。结果:两组在年龄,性别,体重指数,最大肿瘤直径和肿瘤分期方面具有可比性。在CME组中,肿瘤与高血管系结(HVT; 12.6?cm)之间的距离以及最近的肠壁与HVT之间的距离(10.4±0.9?cm)显着大于CRR组(11.5?cm)。 cm和9.3±1.0?cm,分别为P <0.001)。在CME组中,淋巴结的回收数量(23.2)显着增加,术中出血量(108.4?mL)小于CRR(14.0和128.7?mL; P <0.001)。两组切除肠的长度相似(25.8±0.7?cm和25.5±2.1?cm; P = 0.106),手术时间,术后住院时间,首次排便时间和并发症也相似。 CME组的3年复发率(8.4%)显着低于CRR组(20.0%),3年总生存率显着更高(93.5%cf. 85.0%),CME组的3年复发率显着高于CRR组。 T4期,N1期,pTNM II期,pTNM III期和淋巴管浸润明显升高(P <0.05)。两组的Tis,T1,T2,T3,N2期,pTNM I期和神经周浸润生存率相似(P> 0.05)。结论:与CRR相比,以肠系膜上动脉为导向的CME治疗右侧结肠癌的近期预后相似,淋巴结产率更高,三年总生存率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号