首页> 外文期刊>Cancer genomics & proteomics >Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Two Stress-management Strategies in Pancreatic Cancer
【24h】

Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Two Stress-management Strategies in Pancreatic Cancer

机译:胰腺癌两种压力管理策略的蛋白质组比较分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: It is known that cancers adopt different strategies to cope with stress and overcome adverse micro-environmental conditions. Such strategies are also applicable to chemo-therapeutic treatment, which could subsequently result in chemo-resistance. Materials and Methods: In order to investigate known stress-evasion strategies observed in pancreatic cancer, the stress-resistant KLM1-derived cell lines KLM1-R (Gemcitabine (GEM)-induced stress) and KLM1-S (growth factor restriction-induced stress) were employed. Comparative proteomics were employed between for the two cell lines that were also compared against the parent cell line KLM1. Results: Proteomic analysis revealed changes in the expression levels of 6 proteins, namely: transitional endoplasmic reticulum ATPase, lamin A/C, PDZ and LIM protein 1, calmodulin, heat shock protein 60 and alpha enolase. Resistance to GEM of KLM1-R and KLM1-S was found to be comparable, with KLM1-S cells exhibiting close to 1.5-fold higher half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) compared to KLM1-R cells. Conclusion: These results suggest that KLM1-R can be used as a model of directly-acquired chemoresistance (responding directly to evade GEM treatment), while KLM1-S is a good model of indirectly-acquired chemoresistance (formed in response to having to survive with less availability of growth factors), additionally gaining a selective advantage upon GEM treatment.
机译:背景:众所周知,癌症采取不同的策略来应对压力并克服不利的微环境条件。这样的策略也适用于化学治疗,其随后可能导致化学抗性。材料和方法:为了研究在胰腺癌中观察到的已知逃避应激策略,抗应激的KLM1衍生细胞系KLM1-R(吉西他滨(GEM)诱导的应激)和KLM1-S(生长因子限制诱导的应激) )。在两个细胞系之间采用比较蛋白质组学,这两个细胞系也与亲本细胞系KLM1进行了比较。结果:蛋白质组学分析显示了6种蛋白的表达水平发生了变化,即过渡型内质网ATPase,层粘连蛋白A / C,PDZ和LIM蛋白1,钙调蛋白,热休克蛋白60和α烯醇化酶。已发现KLM1-R和KLM1-S对GEM的耐药性相当,与KLM1-R细胞相比,KLM1-S细胞的半数最大抑制浓度(IC50)高出近1.5倍。结论:这些结果表明,KLM1-R可以用作直接获得的化学抗性的模型(直接响应逃避GEM治疗),而KLM1-S是间接获得的化学抗性的良好模型(响应于必须生存而形成)且生长因子的利用率较低),另外在GEM治疗中获得了选择性优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号