...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Management and Research >Comparative effectiveness and resource utilization of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine for the first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a US community setting
【24h】

Comparative effectiveness and resource utilization of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine for the first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a US community setting

机译:在美国社区环境中, nab -紫杉醇联合吉西他滨与FOLFIRINOX或吉西他滨一线治疗转移性胰腺腺癌的比较效果和资源利用

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Despite a clinically relevant, statistically significant survival benefit with nab -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and FOLFIRINOX vs single-agent gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC), little is known regarding their real-world effectiveness. We analyzed patients with mPC using a nationally representative electronic medical records database to address this unmet need. Methods: This retrospective analysis of the Navigating Cancer database compared outcomes among patients who received first-line nab -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, FOLFIRINOX, or gemcitabine for mPC. Effectiveness, safety, and supportive care use were examined. nab -Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine was the reference for statistical comparisons. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar except age (oldest patients were in the gemcitabine cohort followed by nab -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, then FOLFIRINOX). Patients receiving nab -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (n=122) demonstrated similar time to treatment discontinuation (TTD; median, 3.4 vs 3.8 months; P =0.947) and database persistence (DP; median, 8.6 vs 8.6 months; P =0.534) vs FOLFIRINOX (n=80); however, TTD (median, 3.4 vs 2.2 months; P <0.001) and DP (median, 8.6 vs 5.3 months; P =0.030) were significantly longer with nab -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs gemcitabine (n=46). There were more any-grade adverse events with FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine vs nab -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (95% or 89% vs 84%, respectively). Conclusion: This real-world analysis confirms the phase III MPACT trial findings and demonstrates that nab -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine has effectiveness similar to that of FOLFIRINOX but greater tolerability for treating mPC despite younger patients being in the FOLFIRINOX cohort. These findings support nab -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as an appropriate first-line treatment option for patients with mPC.
机译:简介:尽管与单药吉西他滨相比,nab-紫杉醇联合吉西他滨和FOLFIRINOX与单药吉西他滨在临床上相关的,具有统计学意义的生存获益对转移性胰腺癌(mPC)知之甚少。我们使用全国代表性的电子病历数据库分析了mPC患者,以解决这一未满足的需求。方法:对航行癌数据库的这项回顾性分析比较了接受一线nab-紫杉醇联合吉西他滨,FOLFIRINOX或吉西他滨治疗mPC的患者的结局。检查了有效性,安全性和支持性护理使用。 nab-紫杉醇加吉西他滨是统计学比较的参考。结果:基线特征除年龄外均相似(年龄最大的患者为吉西他滨队列,随后为nab-紫杉醇加吉西他滨,然后为FOLFIRINOX)。接受nab-紫杉醇联合吉西他滨(n = 122)的患者与停药时间(TTD;中位3.4 vs 3.8个月; P = 0.947)和数据库持久性(DP;中位8.6 vs 8.6个月; P = 0.534)vs FOLFIRINOX(n = 80);但是,nab-紫杉醇联合吉西他滨vs吉西他滨时,TTD(中位数为3.4 vs 2.2个月; P <0.001)和DP(中位数为8.6 vs 5.3个月; P = 0.030)明显更长(n = 46)。 FOLFIRINOX或吉西他滨与nab-紫杉醇加吉西他滨的不良反应发生率更高(分别为95%或89%对84%)。结论:这项现实世界的分析证实了MPACT III期试验的结果,并表明nab-紫杉醇联合吉西他滨的疗效与FOLFIRINOX相似,但尽管FOLFIRINOX队列中的患者较年轻,但对mPC的耐受性更高。这些发现支持nab-紫杉醇加吉西他滨作为mPC患者的一线治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号