...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Communications >Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation combined with palonosetron on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial
【24h】

Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation combined with palonosetron on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial

机译:经皮穴位电刺激联合帕洛诺司琼对化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的影响:单盲,随机,对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting adversely affects the quality of life of patients who receive chemotherapy via intravenous infusion or transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). This study aimed to investigate the clinical effects of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) on nausea and vomiting after TACE. A total of 142 patients who received TACE with cisplatin for primary or metastatic liver cancer were assigned to the active-acupuncture (n = 72) or placebo-acupuncture (n = 70) groups using a covariate-adaptive randomization at a ratio of 1:1. The acupoints Hegu (LI4), Neiguan (P6), and Zusanli (ST36) were stimulated twice daily for 6 days. The effects of TEAS on nausea and vomiting were assessed by using occurrence rate and severity of these symptoms. Anorexia scale and M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) scores were secondary endpoints and were used to assess the effect of TEAS on patient appetite and quality of life. The safety of the treatments was also monitored. Between the two groups, the differences in occurrence rates and severities of nausea and vomiting after TACE were not significant (all P  0.05). From the second day after TACE, anorexia scores were significantly lower in the active-acupuncture group than in the placebo-acupuncture group and continued to decrease over time with treatment (all P values less than 0.01). On days 0, 1, and 2, the mean MDASI scores for the active-acupuncture group were slightly lower than those for the placebo-acupuncture group, but the differences were not statistically significant (all P  0.05). No significant differences were found between the two groups in the occurrence rate of any adverse event (P  0.05). TEAS appears to be a safe and effective therapy to relieve patients’ gastrointestinal discomfort after chemotherapy. Trial registration NCT01895010. Registered 21 June 2013.
机译:化学疗法引起的恶心和呕吐会对通过静脉输液或经导管动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)接受化学疗法的患者的生活质量产生不利影响。本研究旨在探讨经皮穴位电刺激(TEAS)对TACE后恶心和呕吐的临床效果。总共142例接受TACE联合顺铂治疗原发性或转移性肝癌的患者被分配为活动针灸组(n = 72)或安慰剂针灸组(n = 70),采用协变量自适应随机分配,比例为1: 1。每天两次刺激合谷(LI4),内关(P6)和足三里(ST36)穴位,持续6天。通过使用这些症状的发生率和严重程度,评估TEAS对恶心和呕吐的影响。厌食量表和M. D. Anderson症状量表(MDASI)得分是次要终点,用于评估TEAS对患者食欲和生活质量的影响。还监测了治疗的安全性。两组之间,TACE后恶心和呕吐的发生率和严重程度差异不显着(均P> 0.05)。从TACE后的第二天起,活动针灸组的厌食评分明显低于安慰剂针灸组,并且随着治疗时间的推移持续降低(所有P值均小于0.01)。在第0天,第1天和第2天,活动针灸组的平均MDASI评分略低于安慰剂针灸组的MDASI评分,但差异无统计学意义(所有P> 0.05)。两组不良反应发生率无显着性差异(P> 0.05)。 TEAS似乎是缓解化疗后患者胃肠不适的一种安全有效的疗法。试用注册号NCT01895010。 2013年6月21日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号