首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Communications >Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy using mFOLFOX versus transarterial chemoembolization for massive unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective non-randomized study
【24h】

Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy using mFOLFOX versus transarterial chemoembolization for massive unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective non-randomized study

机译:使用mFOLFOX与经动脉化学栓塞术治疗大面积不可切除肝细胞癌的肝动脉灌注化疗:一项前瞻性非随机研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is recommended as the standard care for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A–B. However, the efficacy of TACE on large (≥ 10 cm) stage A–B HCC is far from satisfactory, and it is proposed that hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) might be a better first-line treatment of this disease. Hence, we compared the safety and efficacy of HAIC with the modified FOLFOX (mFOLFOX) regimen and those of TACE in patients with massive unresectable HCC. A prospective, non-randomized, phase II study was conducted on patients with massive unresectable HCC. The protocol involved HAIC with the mFOLFOX regimen (oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2 intra-arterial infusion; leucovorin, 400 mg/m2 intra-arterial infusion; and fluorouracil, 400 mg/m2 bolus infusion and 2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion) every 3 weeks and TACE with 50 mg of epirubicin, 50 mg of lobaplatin, 6 mg of mitomycin, and lipiodol and polyvinyl alcohol particles. The tumor responses, time-to-progression (TTP), and safety were assessed. A total of 79 patients were recruited for this study: 38 in the HAIC group and 41 in the TACE group. The HAIC group exhibited higher partial response and disease control rates than did the TACE group (52.6% vs. 9.8%, P  0.001; 83.8% vs. 52.5%, P = 0.004). The median TTPs for the HAIC and TACE groups were 5.87 and 3.6 months (hazard radio [HR] = 2.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16–4.76, P = 0.015). More patients in the HAIC group than in the TACE group underwent resection (10 vs. 3, P = 0.033). The proportions of grade 3–4 adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) were lower in the HAIC group than in the TACE group (grade 3–4 AEs: 13 vs. 27, P = 0.007; SAEs: 6 vs. 15, P = 0.044). More patients in the TACE group than in the HAIC group had the study treatment terminated early due to intolerable treatment-related adverse events or the withdrawal of consent (10 vs. 2, P = 0.026). HAIC with mFOLFOX yielded significantly better treatment responses and less serious toxicity than did TACE. HAIC might represent a feasible and promising first-line treatment for patients with massive unresectable HCC.
机译:在巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)的A–B期,建议经动脉化学栓塞(TACE)作为不可切除的肝细胞癌(HCC)的标准护理。然而,TACE对A(B)≥10 cm的大型HCC的疗效远不能令人满意,因此提出肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)可能是该病更好的一线治疗方法。因此,我们将HAIC与改良的FOLFOX(mFOLFOX)方案和TACE方案在无法切除的大规模HCC患者中的安全性和有效性进行了比较。前瞻性,非随机性的II期研究针对的是无法切除的大规模HCC患者。该协议包括将HAIC与mFOLFOX方案(奥沙利铂,85 mg / m2动脉内输注;亚叶酸钙蛋白,400 mg / m2动脉内输注;氟尿嘧啶,400 mg / m2推注输注和2400 mg / m2连续输注)每周一次并用50 mg表柔比星,50 mg洛巴铂,6 mg丝裂霉素以及碘油和聚乙烯醇颗粒进行TACE。评估肿瘤反应,进展时间(TTP)和安全性。该研究共招募了79位患者:HAIC组38位,TACE组41位。与TACE组相比,HAIC组显示出更高的部分缓解率和疾病控制率(52.6%vs.9.8%,P <0.001; 83.8%vs.52.5%,P = 0.004)。 HAIC和TACE组的TTP的中位数分别为5.87和3.6个月(危险无线电[HR] = 2.35,95%置信区间[CI] = 1.16-4.76,P = 0.015)。 HAIC组的患者比TACE组的患者多(10 vs. 3,P = 0.033)。 HAIC组的3-4级不良事件(AE)和严重不良事件(SAE)的比例低于TACE组(3-4级AEs:13 vs. 27,P = 0.007; SAEs:6 vs 。15,P = 0.044)。由于无法忍受的治疗相关不良事件或撤消同意,TACE组的患者比HAIC组的患者提前终止研究治疗(10 vs. 2,P = 0.026)。与TACE相比,含mFOLFOX的HAIC产生了明显更好的治疗反应,且毒性较轻。对于大量无法切除的肝癌患者,HAIC可能代表一种可行且有希望的一线治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号