首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Applied Science and Technology >Area 1 of Approximate Entropy as a Fast and RobustTool to Address Temporal Organization
【24h】

Area 1 of Approximate Entropy as a Fast and RobustTool to Address Temporal Organization

机译:近似熵的领域1作为解决临时组织的快速而强大的工具

获取原文
       

摘要

Aims: To evaluate the consistency and robustness of an informational entropy analytical tool derived from Approximate Entropy (ApEn).Study Design: A set of in machina time-series of known properties were generated to test and compare the proposed tool with the standard ApEn and with peak-ApEn.Place and Duration of Study: Laboratory of Energetics and Theoretical Physiology, Dept. Physiology, Biosciences Institute, University of S?o Paulo. From April 2014 to May 2015.Methodology: The proposed tool consists in obtaining a detailed tolerance vector with more than 100 values and, then, to compute ApEn for window m = 1 for each one of these tolerance values. This creates a curve that is numerically integrated using a normalized tolerance vector as the basis, thus obtaining the area under the curve of m = 1 ApEn (a1ApEn). In order to make comparisons, 17 time-series from different generating processes were constructed using Matlab R2013a. Employing the above-cited analytical tools, we approached the following queries: (a) for a given process, how variable is the estimator value? (b) is a1ApEn more consistent than peak-ApEn in classifying different processes?Results: The answer for (a) is that, in relation to ApEn, the variance of a1ApEn is significantly lower in 16 cases (all P < .01, F-test for sample variance), and we explain why the one exception occurs. In relation to peak-ApEn, the variance is lower for all 17 series (all P < .01). The answer for (b) is that a1ApEn is able to correct inconsistencies found when using peak-ApEn (all P < .01, Student’s t-test).Conclusion: The proposed tool, the area under the curve for ApEn of window 1 (a1ApEn) is objective and more consistent than both the ApEn and the peak-ApEn estimators.
机译:目的:评估从近似熵(ApEn)派生的信息熵分析工具的一致性和鲁棒性。研究设计:生成一组已知时间的已知时间,以测试和比较该工具与标准ApEn和学习高峰期和学习期限:圣保罗大学生物科学研究所,生理学与能量学和理论生理学实验室。从2014年4月到2015年5月。方法:建议的工具包括获得一个包含100个以上值的详细容差矢量,然后为每个容差值中的m = 1的窗口计算ApEn。这将创建一条曲线,该曲线使用归一化的公差向量作为基础进行数值积分,从而获得m = 1 ApEn(a1ApEn)曲线下的面积。为了进行比较,使用Matlab R2013a构建了来自不同生成过程的17个时间序列。利用上述分析工具,我们进行了以下查询:(a)对于给定的过程,估计器值有多大的变量? (b)在对不同过程进行分类时,a1ApEn是否比peak-ApEn更一致?结果:(a)的答案是,相对于ApEn,在16种情况下a1ApEn的方差显着较低(所有P <.01,F -test样本方差),我们将说明为什么会发生一种例外情况。关于峰值ApEn,所有17个序列的方差都较小(所有P <.01)。 (b)的答案是a1ApEn能够纠正使用peak-ApEn时发现的不一致(所有P <.01,学生t检验)。结论:建议的工具,窗口1的ApEn的曲线下面积( a1ApEn)是客观的,并且比ApEn和Peak-ApEn估算器更加一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号