首页> 外文期刊>Buildings >Time-History Seismic Analysis of Masonry Buildings: A Comparison between Two Non-Linear Modelling Approaches
【24h】

Time-History Seismic Analysis of Masonry Buildings: A Comparison between Two Non-Linear Modelling Approaches

机译:砌体建筑的时程地震分析:两种非线性建模方法的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

The paper presents a comparison between two numerical modelling approaches employed to investigate the seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry buildings with flexible diaphragms. The comparison is performed analyzing a two-story prototype tested on a shaking table at the CNR-ENEA research center of Casaccia (Italy). The first numerical model was built by using the finite element (FE) technique, while the second one was built by a simplified macro-element (ME) approach. Both models were employed to perform non-linear dynamic analyses, integrating the equations of motion by step-by-step procedures. The shaking table tests were simulated to analyze the behavior of the prototype from the initial elastic state until the development of extensive damage. The main results of the analyses are discussed and critically compared in terms of engineering parameters, such as accelerations, displacements and base shears. The effectiveness of both models within the investigated typology of buildings is then evaluated in depth.
机译:本文介绍了两种数值模拟方法之间的比较,这两种方法用于研究具有柔性膜片的无筋砌体房屋的地震行为。比较是通过分析在意大利卡萨奇亚(Casaccia)的CNR-ENEA研究中心在振动台上测试的两层楼原型进行的。第一个数值模型是使用有限元(FE)技术构建的,而第二个数值模型是通过简化的宏元素(ME)方法构建的。两种模型均用于执行非线性动力学分析,并通过分步程序对运动方程进行积分。模拟振动台测试以分析原型从初始弹性状态到大范围破坏发展的行为。讨论了分析的主要结果,并根据工程参数(例如加速度,位移和基础剪力)进行了严格的比较。然后,对所研究的建筑物类型内这两种模型的有效性进行了深入评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号