首页> 外文期刊>Cancer control : >Hospital standardised mortality ratio: A reliable indicator of quality of care?
【24h】

Hospital standardised mortality ratio: A reliable indicator of quality of care?

机译:医院标准化死亡率:医疗质量的可靠指标?

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: This study investigates (1) whether the hospital standardised mortality ratio (HSMR) model underestimates or overestimates disease severity and (2) the completeness of the data collected by administrators to calculate HSMR in a cohort of deceased patients with the diagnosis of pneumonia. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and Abbreviated Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (abbMEDS) scores and associated mortality probabilities were obtained from 32 deceased pneumonia patients over the year 2014 in the VU University Medical Centre. These were compared with mortality probabilities of the Central Bureau for Statistics (CBS) calculated for every patient using the HSMR model. Clinical charts were examined to extract relevant comorbidities to determine the reliability of data sent to the national registration of hospital care. Results: Risk categories determined by using the PSI and the abbMEDS were significantly higher compared with the risk categories according to HSMR (p = 0.001, respectively p = 0.000). The mean difference between the number of comorbidities in our registration and the coders’ registration was 1.97 (p = 0.00). The mean difference was 0.97 (p = 0.000) for the number of comorbidities of influence on the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and 1.25 (p = 0.001) for the calculated CCI. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that the mortality probabilities as calculated by the CBS are an underestimation of the risk of dying for each patient. Our study also showed that the registration of data sent to the CBS underestimated the actual comorbidities of the patient, and could possibly influence the HSMR.
机译:背景:本研究调查(1)医院标准化死亡率(HSMR)模型是低估还是高估了疾病的严重程度,以及(2)管理人员收集的用于诊断患有肺炎的死者队列中计算HSMR的数据的完整性。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,获得了2014年VU大学医学中心的32例死于肺炎的患者的肺炎严重程度指数(PSI)和急诊败血症的缩写死亡率(abbMEDS)得分以及相关的死亡率。将这些与使用HSMR模型为每位患者计算的中央统计局(CBS)的死亡率概率进行比较。检查临床图表以提取相关合并症,以确定送往国家医院护理注册的数据的可靠性。结果:与根据HSMR得出的风险类别相比,使用PSI和abbMEDS确定的风险类别明显更高(分别为p = 0.001和p = 0.000)。我们注册的合并症数量与编码员的注册之间的平均差是1.97(p = 0.00)。对Charlson合并症指数(CCI)产生影响的合并症数的平均差异为0.97(p = 0.000),计算得出的CCI的平均差异为1.25(p = 0.001)。结论:这项研究的结果表明,由CBS计算出的死亡率概率低估了每位患者的死亡风险。我们的研究还表明,发送到CBS的数据注册低估了患者的实际合并症,并可能影响HSMR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号