...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine >Development and evaluation of a simulation-based resuscitation scenario assessment tool for emergency medicine residents
【24h】

Development and evaluation of a simulation-based resuscitation scenario assessment tool for emergency medicine residents

机译:针对急诊医学居民的基于模拟的复苏方案评估工具的开发和评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective:We sought to develop and validate a three-station simulation-based Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) tool to assess emergency medicine resident competency in resuscitation scenarios.Methods:An expert panel of emergency physicians developed three scenarios for use with high-fidelity mannequins. For each scenario, a corresponding assessment tool was developed with an essential actions (EA) checklist and a global assessment score (GAS). The scenarios were (1) unstable ventricular tachycardia, (2) respiratory failure, and (3) ST elevation myocardial infarction. Emergency medicine residents were videotaped completing the OSCE, and three clinician experts independently evaluated the videotapes using the assessment tool.Results:Twenty-one residents completed the OSCE (nine residents in the College of Family Physicians of Canada– Emergency Medicine [CCFP-EM] program, six junior residents in the Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians of Canada–Emergency Medicine [FRCP-EM] program, six senior residents in the FRCP-EM). Interrater reliability for the EA scores was good but varied between scenarios (Spearman rho 5 [1] 0.68, [2] 0.81, [3] 0.41). Interrater reliability for the GAS was also good, with less variability (rho 5 [1] 0.64, [2] 0.56, [3] 0.62). When comparing GAS scores, senior FRCP residents outperformed CCFP-EM residents in all scenarios and junior residents in two of three scenarios (p , 0.001 to 0.01). Based on EA scores, senior FRCP residents outperformed CCFP-EM residents, but junior residents outperformed senior FRCP residents in scenario 1 and CCFPEM residents in all scenarios (p 5 0.006 to 0.04).Conclusions:This study outlines the creation of a high-fidelity simulation assessment tool for trainees in emergency medicine. A single-point GAS demonstrated stronger relational validity and more consistent reliability in comparison with an EA checklist. This preliminary work will provide a foundation for ongoing future development of simulationbased assessment tools.
机译:目的:我们寻求开发和验证基于三站模拟的客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)工具,以评估急救人员在复苏情况下的能力。方法:急诊医师专家小组开发了三种可以高保真度使用的方案模特。针对每种情况,开发了相应的评估工具,其中包含基本行动(EA)清单和全局评估分数(GAS)。场景为(1)不稳定的室性心动过速,(2)呼吸衰竭和(3)ST抬高型心肌梗塞。对紧急医疗人员的录像带进行了完整的OSCE录像,三名临床专家使用评估工具对录像带进行了独立评估。结果:21名居民完成了OSCE(加拿大家庭医师学院的9名居民–急诊医学[CCFP-EM]计划中,加拿大皇家内科医学院急症室(FRCP-EM)计划的六名初级居民,FRCP-EM中的六名高级居民。 EA评分的内部评估者信度很好,但在不同情况下有所不同(Spearman rho 5 [1] 0.68,[2] 0.81,[3] 0.41)。 GAS的interrater可靠性也很好,变异性较小(rho 5 [1] 0.64,[2] 0.56,[3] 0.62)。在比较GAS分数时,在所有情况下,高级FRCP居民的表现均优于CCFP-EM居民,在三种情况中的两种情况下,其居民表现均优于未成年人(p,0.001至0.01)。根据EA分数,高级FRCP居民的表现优于CCFP-EM居民,但在方案1和CCFPEM居民中,初级居民的表现均优于FRCP资深居民(p 5 0.006至0.04)。结论:本研究概述了高保真度的创建急诊医学学员的模拟评估工具。与EA清单相比,单点GAS表现出更强的关系效度和更一致的可靠性。这项初步工作将为未来基于仿真的评估工具的持续开发提供基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号