首页> 外文期刊>Cambridge Journal of Eurasian Studies >Competition for pipeline export routes in the Caspian region: The new Great Game or the new Silk Road?
【24h】

Competition for pipeline export routes in the Caspian region: The new Great Game or the new Silk Road?

机译:里海地区管道出口路线的竞争:新的大游戏还是新的丝绸之路?

获取原文
       

摘要

It has often been argued that since 1991 Central Asian and Caspian region had become a playground for the New Great Game between the global superpowers. Analysing the geopolitical competition for Caspian energy resources, this article argues that the New Great Game framework has its limitations as it fails to incorporate the active role played by the Newly Independent Caspian (NIC) states. One cannot deny the fact that the strategic competition among the geopolitical powers for hydrocarbon resources of the Caspian shaped the trajectories of the new pipeline routes. At the same time, the NIC states, namely, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan benefited from the competition as they managed to diversify their export options, achieving greater political and economic independence. In the end, the interaction between the NIC states and energy consumers has led to strengthened energy cooperation along the same area where the ancient Silk Road crossed East Asia, Central Asia and Europe. The findings support the theoretical argument of the article, which stipulates that in exploring the developments in the Caspian region both realist and liberal theories of international relations should be applied in conjunction.
机译:经常有人争辩说,自1991年以来,中亚和里海地区已成为全球超级大国之间新大博弈的运动场。通过分析里海能源资源的地缘政治竞争,本文认为新大博弈框架存在局限性,因为它没有纳入新独立里海(NIC)国家所发挥的积极作用。不能否认这一事实,即地缘政治大国之间对里海油气资源的战略竞争影响了新管道路线的轨迹。同时,NIC国家,即阿塞拜疆,哈萨克斯坦和土库曼斯坦,从竞争中受益,因为它们设法使出口选择多样化,从而实现了更大的政治和经济独立性。最后,NIC国家与能源消费者之间的互动导致沿古老丝绸之路穿越东亚,中亚和欧洲的同一地区加强了能源合作。这些发现支持了本文的理论论点,该论点规定,在探索里海地区的发展时,应结合运用现实主义理论和自由主义国际关系理论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号