...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine >Yes, not now, or never: an analysis of reasons for refusing or accepting emergency department-based take-home naloxone
【24h】

Yes, not now, or never: an analysis of reasons for refusing or accepting emergency department-based take-home naloxone

机译:是的,现在不是,或者永远不会:拒绝或接受急诊科带回家纳洛酮的原因分析

获取原文

摘要

ObjectiveTake-home naloxone (THN) reduces deaths from opioid overdose. To increase THN distribution to at-risk emergency department (ED) patients, we explored reasons for patients’ refusing or accepting THN.MethodsIn an urban teaching hospital ED, we identified high opioid overdose risk patients according to pre-specified criteria. We offered eligible patients THN and participation in researcher-administered surveys, which inquired about reasons to refuse or accept THN and about THN dispensing location preferences. We analyzed refusal and acceptance reasons in open-ended responses, grouped reasons into categories (absolute versus conditional refusals,) then searched for associations between patient characteristics and reasons.ResultsOf 247 patients offered THN, 193 (78.1%) provided reasons for their decision. Of those included, 69 (35.2%) were female, 91 (47.2%) were under age 40, 61 (31.6%) were homeless, 144 (74.6%) reported injection drug use (IDU), and 131 (67.9%) accepted THN. Of 62 patients refusing THN, 19 (30.7%) felt “not at risk” for overdose, while 28 (45.2%) gave conditional refusal reasons: “too sick,” “in a rush,” or preference to get THN elsewhere. Non-IDU was associated with stating “not at risk,” while IDU, homelessness, and age under 40 were associated with conditional refusals. Among acceptances, 86 (65.7%) mentioned saving others as a reason. Most respondents preferred other dispensing locations beside the ED, whether or not they accepted ED THN.ConclusionED patients refusing THN felt “not at risk” for overdose or felt their ED visit was not the right time or place for THN. Most accepting THN wanted to save others.
机译:客观的纳洛酮(THN)可减少因阿片类药物过量引起的死亡。为了增加THN在高危急诊科(ED)患者中的分布,我们探究了拒绝或接受THN的原因。方法在城市教学医院ED中,我们根据预先指定的标准确定了阿片类药物过量的高危患者。我们向合格的患者提供THN并参加研究人员管理的调查,这些调查询问了拒绝或接受THN的原因以及THN分配位置的偏好。我们分析了开放式应答中的拒绝和接受原因,将原因分为类别(绝对拒绝与条件拒绝),然后搜索患者特征与原因之间的关联。结果247例患者提供THN,其中193例(78.1%)提供了做出决定的原因。其中包括69名(35.2%)为女性,91名(47.2%)为40岁以下的无家可归者,61名(31.6%)为无家可归者,144名(74.6%)报告为注射吸毒(IDU)和131名(67.9%)被接受THN。在拒绝THN的62位患者中,有19位(30.7%)感到服用过量没有“危险”,而28位(45.2%)提出了有条件的拒绝原因:“病得太重”,“急于”或倾向于将THN转移到其他地方。非注射吸毒者与陈述“没有危险”有关,而注射吸毒者,无家可归者和40岁以下与有条件拒绝有关。在接受者中,有86人(65.7%)提到保存他人是一个原因。无论是否接受ED THN,大多数受访者都倾向于ED以外的其他配药地点。结论拒绝THN的患者感到用药过量没有“危险”,或者认为他们不宜进行THN。大多数接受THN的人想拯救他人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号