首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Urological Association Journal >High-frequency jet ventilation is beneficial during shock wave lithotripsy utilizing a newer unit with a narrower focal zone
【24h】

High-frequency jet ventilation is beneficial during shock wave lithotripsy utilizing a newer unit with a narrower focal zone

机译:高频射流通气在震波碎石术中是有益的,它使用了具有较窄聚焦区的新型装置

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction: High-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) during shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) has been reported using older lithotripsy units with larger focal zones. We investigated how HFJV affects the clinical parameters of SWL using a newer lithotripsy unit with a smaller focal zone. Methods: We reviewed all patients who underwent SWL by a single surgeon (KVA) from July 2006 until December 2007 with the Siemens Lithostar Modularis (Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany). Either HFJV or conventional anesthetic techniques were used based on the anesthesiologists’ preference. Preoperative imaging was reviewed for stone size, number and location. Total operating room time, procedure time, number of shocks and total energy delivery were analyzed. Postoperative imaging was reviewed for stone-free rates. Results: A total of 112 patients underwent SWL with 80 undergoing conventional anesthesia, and 32 with HFJV. Age, body mass index, preoperative stone size and number were not significantly different between the groups. The HFJV group required significantly less total shocks (3358 vs. 3754, p = 0.0015) and total energy (115.8 joules vs. 137.2 joules, p = 0.0015). Total operating room time, SWL procedure time and postoperative stone-free rates were not significantly different. Conclusions: Previous studies using older SWL units with larger focal zones have demonstrated that HFJV can be effective in reducing total shocks and total energy. Our data is consistent with these studies, but also shows benefit with newer units that have narrower focal zones.
机译:简介:据报道,在使用冲击波碎石术(SWL)期间进行高频喷射通气(HFJV)时,使用了较大的聚焦区的较旧的碎石术设备。我们调查了HFJV如何使用具有较小聚焦区的新型碎石术装置来影响SWL的临床参数。方法:我们回顾了从2006年7月至2007年12月由单一外科医生(KVA)使用Siemens Lithostar Modularis(Siemens AG,​​德国埃尔兰根)进行所有SWL的所有患者。根据麻醉医师的喜好使用HFJV或常规麻醉技术。术前检查了结石的大小,数量和位置。分析了总手术室时间,手术时间,电击次数和总能量传递。回顾了术后影像学检查的无结石率。结果:总共112例行SWL的患者,其中80例行常规麻醉,32例行HFJV。两组之间的年龄,体重指数,术前结石大小和数量无明显差异。 HFJV组所需的总电击次数(3358对3754,p = 0.0015)和总能量(115.8焦耳对137.2焦耳,p = 0.0015)明显更少。总手术室时间,SWL手术时间和术后无结石率无显着差异。结论:以前使用具有较大聚焦区的老式SWL装置进行的研究表明,HFJV可以有效减少总冲击和总能量。我们的数据与这些研究一致,但也显示了焦点区域较窄的新型设备的好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号