...
首页> 外文期刊>Cahiers Agricultures >Participatory assessment of innovative cropping systems combining conservation agriculture and organic farming
【24h】

Participatory assessment of innovative cropping systems combining conservation agriculture and organic farming

机译:参与式评估结合保护性农业和有机农业的创新作物制度

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Organic farmers aim at improving cropping systems to preserve soil fertility. To this end, researchers and organic farmers in two French regions have co- designed 14 cropping systems (prototypes) integrating the principles of conservation agriculture. The objective of this article is to show the contribution of prototype multi-criteria evaluation in the co-design process. Several indicators of the MASC 2.0? model are mobilized to evaluate the objectives farmers assigned to their prototypes. The evaluation proves useful at the individual level: it highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each prototype, allowing each farmer to improve his prototype while considering these different aspects during the redesigning process. It also gives farmers confidence before testing the prototype on farm, as they have a clearer idea of the key points to watch during the experimentation. At the collective level, highlighting strengths or weaknesses shared by several prototypes reinforces farmers in choices made to improve their cropping systems, and encourages them to find collective solutions when weaknesses are shared. While it was already clear for researchers that evaluation is a key step in such work, the fact that farmers also have a positive perception of this method is a sign of its success. Multi-criteria evaluation is also a powerful tool to show the tradeoffs between empirical and scientific knowledge in the design of new cropping systems.
机译:有机农户旨在改善耕作制度,以保持土壤肥力。为此,法国两个地区的研究人员和有机农户共同设计了14种结合了保护性农业原理的种植系统(原型)。本文的目的是展示原型多标准评估在协同设计过程中的贡献。 MASC 2.0的几个指标?调动模型以评估农民分配给其原型的目标。评估在个人层面被证明是有用的:它突出了每个原型的优缺点,使每个农民可以在重新设计过程中考虑这些不同方面的同时改进自己的原型。这也使农民在农场进行原型测试之前充满信心,因为他们对试验过程中要注意的关键点有了更清晰的认识。在集体一级,突出几个原型所共有的优势或劣势,可以使农民在改善其耕作制度方面做出选择,并鼓励他们在共享劣势时寻求集体解决方案。尽管研究人员已经清楚评估是此类工作的关键步骤,但农民对这种方法也抱有积极的看法,这表明该方法取得了成功。多标准评估也是一种功能强大的工具,可以在设计新的种植系统时显示经验知识与科学知识之间的折衷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号