首页> 外文期刊>Biogeosciences >Technical Note: Comparison between a direct and the standard, indirect method for dissolved organic nitrogen determination in freshwater environments with high dissolved inorganic nitrogen concentrations
【24h】

Technical Note: Comparison between a direct and the standard, indirect method for dissolved organic nitrogen determination in freshwater environments with high dissolved inorganic nitrogen concentrations

机译:技术说明:在具有较高溶解无机氮浓度的淡水环境中,测定溶解有机氮的直接方法与标准间接方法之间的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Research on dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) in aquatic systems with highdissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN, the sum of NO3–, NO2– andNH4+) concentrations is often hampered by high uncertaintiesregarding the determined DON concentration. The reason is that DON isdetermined indirectly as the difference between total dissolved nitrogen(TDN) and DIN. In this standard approach to determine DON concentrations,even small relative measurement errors of the DIN and TDN concentrationspropagate into high absolute errors of DON concentrations at high DIN : TDNratios. To improve the DON measurement accuracy at high DIN : TDN ratios,we investigated the DON measurement accuracy of this standard approach according tothe DIN : TDN ratio and compared it to the direct measurementof DON by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) for freshwater systems. Forthis, we used standard compounds and natural samples with and without DINenrichment. We show that for the standard approach, large errors of thedetermined DON concentrations at DIN : TDN ratios >0.6 occur for bothstandard compounds and natural samples. In contrast, measurements of DON bySEC always gave low errors at high DIN : TDN ratios due to the successfulseparation of DON from DIN. For SEC, DON recovery rates were 91–108% forfive pure standard compounds and 89–103% for two standard compounds,enriched with DIN. Moreover, SEC resulted in 93–108% recovery rates forDON concentrations of natural samples at a DIN : TDN ratio of 0.8 and thetechnique was successfully applied to a range of samples from waste watertreatment plants to forest and agricultural streams. With 2.5 h of measurementtime per sample, SEC is slower, but more accurate than the standard approachfor determination of DON concentrations in freshwaters with DIN : TDNratios >0.6. To sum up, the direct DON measurement by SEC enables betterunderstanding of the nitrogen cycle of urban and agricultural freshwatersystems.
机译:高溶解性无机氮(DIN,NO 3 ,NO 2 和NH 4 + )的浓度通常受高度不确定性的影响。原因是DON被间接确定为总溶解氮(TDN)与DIN之间的差异。在这种确定DON浓度的标准方法中,即使DIN和TDN浓度的相对测量误差很小,在高DIN:TDNratios条件下,DON浓度的绝对误差也很高。为了提高在高DIN:TDN比下的DON测量精度,我们根据DIN:TDN比研究了此标准方法的DON测量精度,并将其与通过尺寸排阻色谱法(SEC)直接测量DON的淡水系统进行了比较。为此,我们使用具有和不具有DIN富集的标准化合物和天然样品。我们表明,对于标准方法,标准化合物和天然样品在DIN:TDN比> 0.6时所确定的DON浓度均存在较大误差。相比之下,由于DON与DIN的成功分离,因此在高DIN:TDN比下,DON bySEC的测量始终提供较低的误差。对于SEC,五种纯标准化合物的DON回收率为91–108%,两种富含DIN的标准化合物的DON回收率为89–103%。此外,SEC使DIN:TDN比为0.8的天然样品中DON的浓度回收率达到93-108%,该技术已成功应用于从废水处理厂到森林和农业溪流的一系列样品。每个样品的测量时间为2.5小时,SEC比DIN:TDNratios> 0.6的淡水中DON浓度测定的标准方法要慢,但更准确。综上所述,SEC的直接DON测量可以更好地理解城市和农业淡水系统的氮循环。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号