Fluxes of greenhouse gases (GHG) carbon dioxide (CO2), methane(CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) were measured during a two monthcampaign at a drained peatland forest in Finland by the eddy covariance (EC)technique (CO2 and N2O), and automatic and manual chambers(CO2, CH4 and N2O). In addition, GHG concentrations and soilparameters (mineral nitrogen, temperature, moisture content) in the peatprofile were measured. The aim of the measurement campaign was to quantifythe GHG fluxes during freezing and thawing of the top-soil, a time periodwith potentially high GHG fluxes, and to compare different flux measurementmethods. The forest was a net CO2 sink during the two months and thefluxes of CO2 dominated the GHG exchange. The peat soil was a smallsink of atmospheric CH4 and a small source of N2O. Both CH4oxidation and N2O production took place in the top-soil whereasCH4 was produced in the deeper layers of the peat, which were unfrozenthroughout the measurement period. During the frost-thaw events of thelitter layer distinct peaks in CO2 and N2O emissions wereobserved. The CO2 peak followed tightly the increase in soiltemperature, whereas the N2O peak occurred with a delay after thethawing of the litter layer. CH4 fluxes did not respond to the thawingof the peat soil. The CO2 and N2O emission peaks were not capturedby the manual chambers and hence we conclude that high time-resolutionmeasurements with automatic chambers or EC are necessary to quantify fluxesduring peak emission periods. Sub-canopy EC measurements and chamber-basedfluxes of CO2 and N2O were comparable, although the fluxes ofN2O measured by EC were close to the detection limit of the system. Weconclude that if fluxes are high enough, i.e. greater than 5–10 μg N m?2 h?1,the EC method is a good alternative to measure N2Oand CO2 fluxes at ecosystem scale, thereby minimizing problems withchamber enclosures and spatial representativeness of the measurements.
展开▼