...
首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. >Evaluation of hospital staff’s perceived quality of librarian-mediated literature searching services
【24h】

Evaluation of hospital staff’s perceived quality of librarian-mediated literature searching services

机译:评估医院工作人员对馆员媒介搜索服务的感知质量

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective The research evaluated the perceived quality of librarian-mediated literature searching services at one of Canada’s largest acute care teaching hospitals for the purpose of continuous quality improvement and investigation of relationships between variables that can impact user satisfaction. Methods An online survey was constructed using evidence-based methodologies. A systematic sample of staff and physicians requesting literature searches at London Health Sciences Centre were invited to participate in the study over a one-year period. Data analyses included descriptive statistics of closed-ended questions and coding of open-ended questions. Results A range of staff including clinicians, researchers, educators, leaders, and analysts submitted a total of 137 surveys, representing a response rate of 71%. Staff requested literature searches for the following “primary” purposes: research or publication (34%), teaching or training (20%), informing a policy or standard practice (16%), patient care (15%), and “other” purposes (15%). While the majority of staff (76%) submitted search requests using methods of written communication, including email and search request forms, staff using methods of verbal communication, including face-to-face and telephone conversations, were significantly more likely to be extremely satisfied with the librarian’s interpretation of the search request ( p =0.004) and to rate the perceived quality of the search results as excellent ( p =0.005). In most cases, librarians followed up with staff to clarify the details of their search requests (72%), and these staff were significantly more likely to be extremely satisfied with the librarian’s interpretation of the search request ( p =0.002). Conclusions Our results demonstrate the limitations of written communication in the context of librarian-mediated literature searching and suggest a multifaceted approach to quality improvement efforts.
机译:目的该研究评估了加拿大最大的急诊教学医院之一的图书馆员介导的文献检索服务的感知质量,目的是持续改善质量并调查可能影响用户满意度的变量之间的关系。方法使用基于证据的方法构建在线调查。邀请在伦敦健康科学中心进行文献检索的系统化工作人员和医生样本,在一年的时间内参加了这项研究。数据分析包括封闭性问题的描述性统计和开放性问题的编码。结果包括临床医生,研究人员,教育工作者,领导和分析人员在内的一系列人员共进行了137项调查,答复率为71%。工作人员要求为以下“主要”目的进行文献检索:研究或发表(34%),教学或培训(20%),提供政策或标准操作依据(16%),患者护理(15%)和“其他”目的(15%)。尽管大多数员工(76%)使用书面通讯方式(包括电子邮件和搜索请求表格)提交了搜索请求,但是使用口头交流方式(包括面对面和电话交谈)的员工非常可能非常满意并由馆员解释搜索请求(p = 0.004),并将搜索结果的感知质量评为极好(p = 0.005)。在大多数情况下,馆员会跟进人员澄清其搜索请求的详细信息(占72%),并且这些人员对馆员对搜索请求的解释非常满意(p = 0.002)。结论我们的结果证明了在图书馆员介导的文献搜索中书面交流的局限性,并提出了质量改进工作的多方面方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号