首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology >Comparison of transverse short-axis classic and oblique long-axis “Syringe-Free” approaches for internal jugular venous catheterization under ultrasound guidance
【24h】

Comparison of transverse short-axis classic and oblique long-axis “Syringe-Free” approaches for internal jugular venous catheterization under ultrasound guidance

机译:在超声引导下横向短轴经典和斜长轴“无注射器”方法对颈内静脉置管的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and objectives There are different ultrasound probe positions used for internal jugular venous catheter placement. Also, in-plane or out of plane needle approach may be used for catheterization. Transverse short-axis classic approach is the most popular performed approach in literature. “Syringe-Free” is a new described technique that is performed with oblique long-axis approach. We aimed to compare performance of these two approaches. Methods This study was conducted as a prospective and randomized study. 80 patients were included the study and allocated into two groups that were named Group C (transverse short-axis classic approach) and Group SF (oblique long-axis syringe-free approach) by a computer-generated randomization. The primary outcome was mean time that guidewire is seen in the Internal jugular vein (performing time). The secondary outcomes were to compare number of needle pass, number of skin puncture and complications between two groups. Results Demographic and hemodynamic data were not significantly different. The mean performing time was 54.9±19.1s in Group C and 43.9±15.8s in Group SF. Significant differences were found between the groups ( p =0.006). Mean number of needle pass was 3.2(±2.1) in Group C and 2.1(±1.6) in Group SF. There were statistically significant differences between two groups ( p =0.002). The number of skin puncture was 1.6(±0.8) and 1.2(±0.5) in Group C and SF, respectively ( p =0.027). Conclusion “Syringe-Free” technique has lower performing time, number of needle pass and skin puncture. Also, it allows to follow progress of guide-wire under continuous ultrasound visualization and the procedure does not need assistance during catheter insertion. Namely, “Syringe-Free” is effective, safe and fast technique that may be used to place internal jugular venous catheter.
机译:背景和目的颈内静脉置管有不同的超声探头位置。同样,面内或面外针入路可用于导管插入。横向短轴经典方法是文学中最受欢迎的执行方法。 “无注射器”是一种新描述的技术,它是通过倾斜长轴方法执行的。我们旨在比较这两种方法的性能。方法本研究是一项前瞻性随机研究。纳入研究的80例患者通过计算机生成的随机分组分为C组(横向短轴经典入路)和SF组(斜长轴无针刺入路)两组。主要结果是在颈内静脉看到导丝的平均时间(进行时间)。次要结果是比较两组之间的针通过次数,皮肤穿刺次数和并发症。结果人口统计学和血液动力学数据无显着差异。 C组的平均表演时间为54.9±19.1s,SF组的平均表演时间为43.9±15.8s。发现两组之间存在显着差异(p = 0.006)。 C组平均针刺数为3.2(±2.1),SF组平均针刺数为2.1(±1.6)。两组之间在统计学上有显着差异(p = 0.002)。 C组和SF组的皮肤穿刺次数分别为1.6(±0.8)和1.2(±0.5)(p = 0.027)。结论“无针”技术具有较低的执行时间,针通过次数和皮肤穿刺。而且,它允许在连续的超声可视化下跟踪导丝的进展,并且该过程在导管插入期间不需要帮助。即,“无注射器”是可用于放置颈内静脉导管的有效,安全和快速的技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号