首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology >Iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block in inguinal hernia repair for postoperative pain management: comparison of the anatomical landmark and ultrasound guided techniques
【24h】

Iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block in inguinal hernia repair for postoperative pain management: comparison of the anatomical landmark and ultrasound guided techniques

机译:腹股沟疝修补术中的hy下腹/腹股沟神经阻滞用于术后疼痛处理:解剖学界标和超声引导技术的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve blocks performed with the ultrasound guided and the anatomical landmark techniques for postoperative pain management in cases of adult inguinal herniorrhaphy.Methods40 patients, ASA I–II status were randomized into two groups equally: in Group AN (anatomical landmark technique) and in Group ultrasound (ultrasound guided technique), iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block was performed with 20ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine prior to surgery with the specified techniques. Pain score in postoperative assessment, first mobilization time, duration of hospital stay, score of postoperative analgesia satisfaction, opioid induced side effects and complications related to block were assessed for 24h postoperatively.ResultsVAS scores at rest in the recovery room and all the clinical follow-up points were found significantly less in Group ultrasound (p<0.01 orp<0.001). VAS scores at movement in the recovery room and all the clinical follow-up points were found significantly less in Group ultrasound (p<0.001 in all time points). While duration of hospital stay and the first mobilization time were being found significantly shorter, analgesia satisfaction scores were found significantly higher in ultrasound Group (p<0.05,p<0.001,p<0.001 respectively).ConclusionAccording to our study, US guided iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block in adult inguinal herniorrhaphies provides a more effective analgesia and higher satisfaction of analgesia than iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block with the anatomical landmark technique. Moreover, it may be suggested that the observation of anatomical structures with the US may increase the success of the block, and minimize the block-related complications.
机译:目的本研究的目的是比较超声引导下的i下腹/腹股沟神经阻滞和解剖标志性技术在成人腹股沟疝气治疗中的术后疼痛管理效果。方法40例患者,ASA I–II状态随机分为两组同样:在AN组(解剖学界标技术)和超声组(超声引导技术)中,在使用指定技术进行手术前,先用20ml 0.5%左旋布比卡因进行i下胃/腹股沟神经阻滞。术后24小时评估术后评估中的疼痛评分,首次动员时间,住院时间,术后镇痛满意度,阿片类药物引起的副作用以及与阻滞相关的并发症。结果恢复室静息状态下的VAS评分以及所有临床随访-组超声检查发现上升点明显较少(p <0.01或p <0.001)。在小组超声检查中发现恢复室运动时的VAS评分和所有临床随访点均显着减少(在所有时间点均p <0.001)。虽然超声检查组的住院时间和首次动员时间明显缩短,但超声镇痛满意度却显着更高(分别为p <0.05,p <0.001,p <0.001)。结论根据我们的研究,美国引导的i下胃/与解剖标志性技术相比,成人腹股沟疝患者的ing神经末梢神经阻滞比i腹胃//神经末梢神经阻滞提供了更有效的镇痛效果和更高的镇痛满意度。此外,可能提示用US观察解剖结构可能会增加阻滞的成功率,并最大程度地减少与阻滞相关的并发症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号