首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology >A comparison of various supraglottic airway devices for fiberoptical guided tracheal intubation
【24h】

A comparison of various supraglottic airway devices for fiberoptical guided tracheal intubation

机译:光纤引导气管插管的各种声门上气道装置的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Fiberoptical assisted intubation via placed supraglottic airway devices has been described as safe and easy procedure to manage difficult airways. However visualization of the glottis aperture is essential for fiberoptical assisted intubation. Various different supraglottic airway devices are commercially available and might offer different conditions for fiberoptical assisted intubation. The aim of this study was to compare the best obtainable view of the glottic aperture using different supraglottic airway devices. Methods With approval of the local ethics committee 52 adult patients undergoing elective anesthesia were randomly assigned to a supraglottic airway device (Laryngeal Tube, Laryngeal Mask Airway I-Gel, Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique, Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme, Laryngeal Mask Airway Aura-once). After standardized induction of anesthesia the supraglottic airway device was placed according to the manufacturers recommendations. After successful ventilation the position of the supraglottic airway device in regard to the glottic opening was examined with a flexible fiberscope. A fully or partially visible glottic aperture was considered as suitable for fiberoptical assisted intubation. Suitability for fiberoptical assisted intubation was compared between the groups ( H -test, U -test; p 0.05). Results Demographic data was not different between the groups. Placement of the supraglottic airway device and adequate ventilation was successful in all attempts. Glottic view suitable for fiberoptical assisted intubation differed between the devices ranging from 40% for the laringeal tube (LT), 66% for the laryngeal mask airway Supreme, 70% for the Laryngeal Mask Airway I-Gel and 90% for both the Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Aura-once. Conclusion None of the used supraglottic airway devices offered a full or partial glottic view in all cases. However the Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Aura-once seem to be more suitable for fiberoptical assisted intubation compared to other devices.
机译:背景技术已经描述了通过放置的声门上气道设备进行的光纤辅助插管是处理困难气道的安全简便的方法。但是,声门孔径的可视化对于光纤辅助插管至关重要。各种不同的声门上气道装置是可商购的,并且可能为光纤辅助插管提供不同的条件。这项研究的目的是比较使用不同的声门上气道装置可获得的最佳声门孔径视野。方法经地方伦理委员会批准,将52例行择期麻醉的成年患者随机分配至声门上气道器械(喉管,喉罩气道I-Gel,喉罩气道唯一,喉罩气道至尊,喉罩气道一次) 。在标准化麻醉诱导后,根据制造商的建议放置声门上气道装置。成功通气后,用柔性纤维镜检查声门上气道装置相对于声门开口的位置。完全或部分可见的声门孔被认为适用于光纤辅助插管。在各组之间比较了光纤辅助插管的适用性(H检验,U检验; p <0.05)。结果两组之间的人口统计学数据没有差异。在所有尝试中,声门上气道装置的放置和足够的通风都是成功的。适用于光纤辅助插管的声门视图在两种设备之间有所不同:喉管(LT)占40%,喉罩气道Supreme占66%,喉罩I-Gel占70%,喉罩均占90%独特的气道和喉罩气道光环一次。结论在所有情况下,所用的声门上气道装置均不能提供全部或部分声门视野。但是,与其他设备相比,“喉罩独特的气道”和“喉罩光环一次”似乎更适合于光纤辅助插管。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号