...
首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology >Comparison of propofol and midazolam on patients undergoing spinal surgery with intraoperative wake-up test: randomized clinical trial
【24h】

Comparison of propofol and midazolam on patients undergoing spinal surgery with intraoperative wake-up test: randomized clinical trial

机译:异丙酚和咪达唑仑在接受脊柱外科手术的患者中进行术中唤醒试验的比较:随机临床试验

获取原文

摘要

Background and objectives Instrumentation in correction operations for spinal deformities carries a 0.5–5% risk of injuring the spinal cord. The wake-up test is used for early detection of these injuries. In this study we compared the effects of propofol and midazolam during wake-up test in scoliosis surgery. Methods Thirty patients were randomly assigned as group P and group M. Anesthesia was induced with propofol 2.5mgkg ?1 for group P or midazolam 0.5mgkg ?1 for group M with remifentanil 0.5μgkg ?1 and cisatracurium 0.15mgkg ?1 for both groups. At the maintenance of anesthesia O 2 /air and infusions of remifentanil and cisatracurium were used. In group P, propofol 6–10mgkg ?1 h ?1 and in group M, midazolam 0.5mgmgkg ?1 were preferred. Approximately 15min before the wake-up test, all drugs were discontinued. At the wake-up test, anesthesiologist asked the patients to open their eyes and squeeze his/her hand at every 30s until the patients responded. Then patients were told to wiggle their toes. Hemodynamic parameters, time of eye-opening, appropriate movement upon verbal command were evaluated. BIS frequency throughout the operation was recorded. Results The eye opening time was 9±2.15min in group P and 7±3.15min in group M. Motor movement time was 12±2.55min in group P and 21.25±3.93min in group M. Conclusion Propofol provided better wake-up conditions and conducted a better neurologic assessment within the same BIS values than midazolam.
机译:背景与目的脊柱畸形矫正手术中的仪器可能会导致0.5-5%的脊髓损伤风险。唤醒测试用于早期发现这些伤害。在这项研究中,我们比较了异丙酚和咪达唑仑在脊柱侧凸手术的唤醒测试中的作用。方法将30例患者随机分为P组和M组。P组麻醉剂量为异丙酚2.5mgkg≤1,M组给予咪达唑仑0.5mgkg≤1,瑞芬太尼0.5μgkg≤1和西沙曲库铵0.15mgkg≤1进行麻醉。在维持麻醉状态下,使用O 2 /空气以及瑞芬太尼和西沙曲库铵进行输注。在P组中,丙泊酚6-10mg / kg·h-1,在M组中,咪达唑仑0.5mg / mg·kg·1是优选的。唤醒测试前约15分钟,所有药物均已停用。在唤醒测试中,麻醉师要求患者每隔30秒睁开眼睛并捏紧他/她的手,直到患者做出反应为止。然后,告诉患者摆动脚趾。评估血流动力学参数,睁眼时间,口头命令后适当运动。记录整个操作过程中的BIS频率。结果P组睁眼时间为9±2.15min,M组为7±3.15min。P组运动时间为12±2.55min,M组为21.25±3.93min。结论异丙酚提供了较好的唤醒条件在相同的BIS值范围内进行了比咪达唑仑更好的神经系统评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号