首页> 外文期刊>Brain and Behavior >A factor analysis of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms using data pooled from two venlafaxine extended‐release clinical trials
【24h】

A factor analysis of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms using data pooled from two venlafaxine extended‐release clinical trials

机译:使用两项文拉法辛缓释临床试验收集的数据对创伤后应激障碍症状进行因子分析

获取原文
           

摘要

AbstractBackgroundConfirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition) (DSM-IV) three-factor posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnostic criteria was conducted to determine fit for this patient population. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of alternate symptom structures was planned to identify symptoms that cluster in this population. The response of symptom factors to treatment with venlafaxine extended release (ER) was explored.MethodsBaseline 17-item Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-SX17) data were pooled from patients enrolled in two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. The CFA was conducted using maximum likelihood and weighted, least-squares factor extraction methods. The EFA was performed using a polychoric correlation covariance matrix and Pearson correlation matrix.ResultsData from a pooled population of 685 patients (venlafaxine ER: n = 339; placebo: n = 346) were analyzed. CFA rejected the DSM-IV three-factor structure. The EFA identified a different three-factor structure as the best fit: factor 1 included reexperiencing symptoms, factor 2 included symptoms of altered mood and cognition, whereas factor 3 comprised avoidance and arousal symptoms. All DSM-IV symptom factors and all factors in the identified three-factor model responded positively to venlafaxine ER treatment.ConclusionsData are consistent with literature failing to confirm the three-factor structure of DSM-IV PTSD, and they support the DSM-5 inclusion of a symptom cluster addressing altered mood and cognition in PTSD. The efficacy of venlafaxine ER in reducing a range of symptom clusters in PTSD is consistent with its multiple mechanisms of action.
机译:摘要进行了《精神障碍诊断和统计手册》(第四版)(DSM-IV)的三因素创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)诊断标准的确证因素分析(CFA),以确定适合该患者人群的因素。计划对其他症状结构进行探索性因素分析(EFA),以识别聚集在该人群中的症状。方法收集来自两个双盲患者的基线17项临床医师管理的PTSD量表(CAPS-SX 17 )数据,探讨文拉法辛缓释(ER)治疗对症状因素的反应。 ,随机,安慰剂对照试验。使用最大似然法和加权最小二乘因子提取方法进行CFA。使用多变量相关协方差矩阵和Pearson相关矩阵执行EFA,分析了来自685名患者的汇总数据(文拉法辛ER:n = 339;安慰剂:n = 346)。 CFA拒绝了DSM-IV三要素结构。全民教育认为不同的三因素结构最适合:因素1包括重新出现的症状,因素2包括情绪和认知改变的症状,而因素3包括回避和唤醒症状。所有的DSM-IV症状因素和已确定的三因素模型中的所有因素均对文拉法辛ER治疗呈阳性反应。结论数据与未能证实DSM-IV PTSD的三因素结构的文献一致,它们支持DSM-5纳入解决PTSD中情绪和认知改变的症状群。文拉法辛ER减少PTSD中一系列症状簇的功效与其多种作用机制一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号