首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychiatry >Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in patients suffering from psychiatric disorders: a cross-sectional study exploring the experiences of Dutch psychiatrists
【24h】

Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in patients suffering from psychiatric disorders: a cross-sectional study exploring the experiences of Dutch psychiatrists

机译:安乐死和精神分裂症患者的医生协助下的自杀:一项横断面研究,探讨荷兰精神科医生的经历

获取原文
       

摘要

The medical-ethical dilemmas related to euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (EAS) in psychiatric patients are highly relevant in an international context. EAS in psychiatric patients appears to become more frequent in the Netherlands. However, little is known about the experiences of psychiatrists with this practice. This study aims to estimate the incidence of EAS (requests) in psychiatric practice in The Netherlands and to describe the characteristics of psychiatric patients requesting EAS, the decision-making process and outcomes of these requests. In the context of the third evaluation of the Dutch Euthanasia Act, a cross-sectional study was performed between May and September 2016. A questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 500 Dutch psychiatrists. Of the 425 eligible psychiatrists 49% responded. Frequencies of EAS and EAS requests were estimated. Detailed information was asked about the most recent case in which psychiatrists granted and/or refused an EAS request, if any. The total number of psychiatric patients explicitly requesting for EAS was estimated to be between 1100 and 1150 for all psychiatrists in a one year period from 2015 to 2016. An estimated 60 to 70 patients received EAS in this period. Nine psychiatrists described a case in which they granted an EAS request from a psychiatric patient. Five of these nine patients had a mood disorder. Three patients had somatic comorbidity. Main reasons to request EAS were ‘depressive feelings’ and ‘suffering without prospect of improvement’. Sixty-six psychiatrists described a case in which they refused an EAS request. 59% of these patients had a personality disorder and 19% had somatic comorbidity. Main reasons to request EAS were ‘depressive feelings’ and ‘desperate situations in several areas of life’. Most requests were refused because the due care criteria were not met. Although the incidence of EAS in psychiatric patients increased over the past two decades, this practice remains relatively rare. This is probably due to the complexity of assessing the due care criteria in case of psychiatric suffering. Training and support may enable psychiatrists to address this sensitive issue in their work better.
机译:在国际范围内,与精神病患者的安乐死和医生协助的自杀(EAS)有关的医学伦理困境非常相关。在荷兰,精神病患者的EAS似乎越来越常见。但是,对于精神科医生的这种做法所知甚少。这项研究旨在估计荷兰在精神科实践中EAS(请求)的发生率,并描述请求EAS的精神病患者的特征,决策过程和这些请求的结果。在对《荷兰安乐死法》进行第三次评估的背景下,于2016年5月至2016年9月进行了横断面研究。向500名荷兰精神科医生随机抽样发送了问卷。在425名合格的精神科医生中,有49%做出了回应。估计了EAS和EAS请求的频率。询问了有关最近的精神科医生批准和/或拒绝EAS请求(如有)的详细信息。在2015年至2016年的一年期间,所有精神科医生明确要求EAS的精神病患者总数估计在1100至1150之间。在此期间,估计有60至70例患者接受了EAS。九名精神科医生描述了一个他们同意接受精神病患者的EAS请求的案例。这九名患者中有五名患有情绪障碍。 3例患有躯体合并症。要求EAS的主要原因是“沮丧的情绪”和“没有改善前景的痛苦”。六十六名精神科医生描述了他们拒绝EAS请求的情况。这些患者中有59%患有人格障碍,而19%患有躯体合并症。要求EAS的主要原因是“沮丧的情绪”和“生活中几个方面的绝望情况”。大多数请求被拒绝,因为不符合适当的护理标准。尽管在过去的二十年中,精神病患者的EAS发病率有所增加,但这种做法仍然相对罕见。这可能是由于评估精神病患者适当护理标准的复杂性。培训和支持可以使精神科医生更好地解决其工作中的这一敏感问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号