...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychiatry >Economic evaluation of an experience sampling method intervention in depression compared with treatment as usual using data from a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Economic evaluation of an experience sampling method intervention in depression compared with treatment as usual using data from a randomized controlled trial

机译:使用随机对照试验的数据,对与常规治疗相比抑郁治疗的经验抽样方法进行干预的经济评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Experience sampling, a method for real-time self-monitoring of affective experiences, holds opportunities for person-tailored treatment. By focussing on dynamic patterns of positive affect, experience sampling method interventions (ESM-I) accommodate strategies to enhance personalized treatment of depression―at potentially low-costs. This study aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of an experience sampling method intervention in patients with depression, from a societal perspective. Participants were recruited between January 2010 and February 2012 from out-patient mental health care facilities in or near the Dutch cities of Eindhoven and Maastricht, and through local advertisements. Out-patients diagnosed with major depression (n?=?101) receiving pharmacotherapy were randomized into: (i) ESM-I consisting of six weeks of ESM combined with weekly feedback regarding the individual’s positive affective experiences, (ii) six weeks of ESM without feedback, or (iii) treatment as usual only. Alongside this randomised controlled trial, an economic evaluation was conducted consisting of a cost-effectiveness and a cost-utility analysis, using Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) as outcome, with willingness-to-pay threshold for a QALY set at €50,000 (based on Dutch guidelines for moderate severe to severe illnesses). The economic evaluation showed that ESM-I is an optimal strategy only when willingness to pay is around €3000 per unit HDRS and around €40,500 per QALY. ESM-I was the least favourable treatment when willingness to pay was lower than €30,000 per QALY. However, at the €50,000 willingness-to-pay threshold, ESM-I was, with a 46% probability, the most favourable treatment (base-case analysis). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these results. We may tentatively conclude that ESM-I is a cost-effective add-on intervention to pharmacotherapy in outpatients with major depression. Netherlands Trial register, NTR1974 .
机译:体验采样是一种实时自我监控情感体验的方法,可提供针对个人的治疗机会。通过关注积极影响的动态模式,经验抽样方法干预措施(ESM-1)提供了以潜在的低成本增强抑郁症个性化治疗的策略。这项研究的目的是从社会角度调查经验抽样方法干预抑郁症患者的成本效益。参与者于2010年1月至2012年2月之间从荷兰埃因霍温和马斯特里赫特市或其附近的门诊心理保健机构招募,并通过当地广告招募。诊断为患有重度抑郁症(n = 101)的门诊患者接受药物治疗被随机分为:(i)ESM-1由六周的ESM组成,结合有关个人积极情感经历的每周反馈,(ii)六周的ESM没有反馈,或(iii)仅照常进行治疗。除了这项随机对照试验外,还进行了经济效益评估,包括成本效益和成本效用分析,并使用汉密尔顿抑郁评估量表(HDRS)和质量调整生命年(QALYs)作为结果,并有愿意支付的门槛QALY设定为50,000欧元(根据荷兰中度至重度疾病指南)。经济评估表明,仅当每单位HDRS的支付意愿约为3000欧元且每QALY约为40,500欧元时,ESM-1才是最佳策略。当支付意愿低于每QALY 30,000欧元时,ESM-1是最不利的待遇。然而,在50,000欧元的支付意愿门槛下,ESM-1是最有利的治疗方法(基础案例分析),可能性为46%。敏感性分析证实了这些结果的稳健性。我们可以初步得出结论,ESM-1是重度抑郁症门诊患者药物治疗的一种经济有效的附加干预措施。荷兰审判登记册,NTR1974。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号