首页> 外文期刊>BMC proceedings. >Proceedings of the 2017 Advancing the Science of Community Engaged Research (CEnR) Conference
【24h】

Proceedings of the 2017 Advancing the Science of Community Engaged Research (CEnR) Conference

机译:2017推进社区参与科学(CEnR)会议的论文集

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundTo address an urgent need to advance the field of community engaged research, faculty at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Meharry Medical College organized the national meeting "Advancing the Science of Community Engaged Research (CEnR): Innovative & Effective Methods of Stakeholder Engagement in Translational Research, Washington, DC September 14-15, 2017 (See Additional file 1 ). These meetings brought together a diverse group of stakeholders to share community engaged research evidence and practical knowledge for implementing new and enhancing existing research programs. The conference series’ goals were: 1) to expand the scientific basis for the community engaged research field by convening researchers, community partners, patient advocacy organizations, and others to share innovative methods and strategies; 2) to engage community representatives and patient advocates in the development of new approaches in community engaged research by meaningfully involving them in the planning, as speakers and presenters, and as conference participants; and 3) to catalyze innovative community engaged research using interactive meeting methods that promote learning, support collective problem solving, and encourage new conceptual frameworks. These conferences have advanced community engagement across the translational research spectrum in biomedical research. For the 2017 meeting, described here, the overarching theme was Innovative and Effective Methods of Stakeholder Engagement in Translational Research. MethodsThe forum was attended by over 210 participants. This conference used novel approaches to fulfill its objectives of participant diversity, meaningful stakeholder engagement, and eliciting varied distinct perspectives to advance the science of community engaged research. Innovative strategies for the conference included: Think Tanks focused on emerging community engaged research topics or topics in need of urgent attention. These dynamic group sessions provided for freely sharing ideas with the purpose of creating change and facilitating new research collaborations. Learning Labs offered unique opportunities to gain practical knowledge regarding innovative methods in community engaged research. Learning Labs also?facilitated the wide broadcast of locally successful engagement methods with the goal of speeding the uptake and implementation of community engaged methods. Travel Scholarships were provided for twenty community and patient representatives to participate in the conference. The lack of travel funds was a significant barrier to stakeholder participation in prior community engaged research meetings. The scholarships expanded the role of community and patient representatives in setting research priorities and promoting methods development. Meaningful Engagement meant that community members and patients participated in decision making on all aspects of the conference planning, including the selection of themes, topics, and speakers, and were fully integrated into the conference as speakers, panelists, and moderators. ConclusionsCommunity and stakeholder engagement can directly impact research by enhancing clinical trial design, increasing relevance, and increasing recruitment, accrual and retention (Staley K.: Exploring Impact: Public 53 Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research – INVOLVE.; 2009, Johnson et al Clin Transl Sci 8:388-54 390, 2015, Joosten et al Acad Med 90:1646-1650, 2015). The 2017 Advancing the Science of Community Engaged Research meeting, Innovative and Effective Methods of Stakeholder Engagement in Translational Research facilitated meaningful engagement of diverse stakeholder groups including racial and ethnic minorities, community and patient representatives, and junior investigators. Of 210 attendees, 72 completed the evaluation, and, of those, 36% self-affiliated as community members, and 21% as patient/caregiver advocacy, faith-based, or tribal organization members. This conference 1) represented a step toward expanding the scientific basis for the community engaged research (CEnR) field; 2) catalyzed innovative community engaged research; and 3) enhanced the reach and impact of the scientific developments emerging from pioneering work in community engagement.
机译:背景技术为解决迫切需要发展社区参与研究领域的问题,范德比尔特大学医学中心和Meharry医学院的教师组织了全国会议“推进社区参与研究的科学(CEnR):创新和有效的利益相关者参与转化研究的方法,华盛顿特区,2017年9月14日至15日(请参阅附加文件1),这些会议聚集了众多利益相关者,以分享社区参与的研究证据和实践知识,以实施新的和增强现有的研究计划。 :1)通过召集研究人员,社区合作伙伴,患者倡导组织和其他人员共享创新方法和策略,扩大社区参与研究领域的科学基础; 2)促使社区代表和患者倡导者参与新方法的开发。社区通过有意义的参与来参与研究在计划中,作为演讲者和演示者,以及作为会议参与者; 3)使用互动会议方法促进社区参与的创新研究,以促进学习,支持集体问题解决并鼓励新的概念框架。这些会议在生物医学研究的整个转化研究领域中都有先进的社区参与。对于此处描述的2017年会议,总体主题是创新和有效的利益相关方参与转化研究的方法。方法该论坛有210多人参加。此次会议采用了新颖的方法来实现其参与者多样性,有意义的利益相关者参与以及达成各种不同观点以促进社区参与研究的科学化的目标。会议的创新策略包括:智囊团专注于新兴社区参与的研究主题或需要紧急关注的主题。这些动态的小组会议提供了自由共享想法的目的,目的是创造变化并促进新的研究合作。学习实验室提供了独特的机会来获得有关社区参与研究中创新方法的实践知识。学习实验室还促进了本地成功参与方法的广泛传播,目的是加快社区参与方法的采用和实施。为二十个社区和患者代表提供了旅行奖学金,以参加会议。差旅资金的缺乏是利益相关者参加先前社区参与的研究会议的重要障碍。奖学金扩大了社区和患者代表在确定研究重点和促进方法开发方面的作用。有意义的参与意味着社区成员和患者参与会议计划各个方面的决策,包括主题,主题和演讲者的选择,并以演讲者,小组成员和主持人的身份完全融入会议。结论社区和利益相关者的参与可以通过增强临床试验设计,增加相关性以及增加招募,应计和保留来直接影响研究(Staley K .:探索影响:NHS公众53参与,公共卫生和社会关怀研究–INVOLVE。2009年, Johnson等人,Clin Transl Sci 8:388-54 390,2015,Joosten等人Acad Med 90:1646-1650,2015)。 2017年推进社区参与科学研究会议,创新有效的利益相关方参与转化研究方法,促进了包括种族和少数民族,社区和患者代表以及初级调查员在内的各种利益相关方群体的有意义参与。在210位参与者中,有72位完成了评估,其中36%的人是社区成员,而21%的患者/照顾者的拥护者,基于信仰或部落的成员。这次会议1)代表了朝着扩大社区参与研究(CEnR)领域的科学基础迈出的一步; 2)促进创新社区参与研究; 3)扩大了社区参与方面的开拓性工作所产生的科学发展的影响力和影响力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号