首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychiatry >A pragmatic randomized control trial and realist evaluation on the implementation and effectiveness of an internet application to support self-management among individuals seeking specialized mental health care: a study protocol
【24h】

A pragmatic randomized control trial and realist evaluation on the implementation and effectiveness of an internet application to support self-management among individuals seeking specialized mental health care: a study protocol

机译:实用的随机对照试验和对互联网应用的实施和有效性进行评估的现实评估,以支持寻求专业心理健康护理的个人进行自我管理:一项研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Mental illness is a substantial and rising contributor to the global burden of disease. Access to and utilization of mental health care, however, is limited by structural barriers such as specialist availability, time, out-of-pocket costs, and attitudinal barriers including stigma. Innovative solutions like virtual care are rapidly entering the health care domain. The advancement and adoption of virtual care for mental health, however, often occurs in the absence of rigorous evaluation and adequate planning for sustainability and spread. Methods A pragmatic randomized controlled trial with a nested comparative effectiveness arm, and concurrent realist process evaluation to examine acceptability, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of the Big White Wall (BWW) online platform for mental health self-management and peer support among individuals aged 16 and older who are accessing mental health services in Ontario, Canada. Participants will be randomized to 3?months of BWW or treatment as usual. At the end of the 3?months, participants in the intervention group will have the opportunity to opt-in to an intervention extension arm. Those who opt-in will be randomized to receive an additional 3?months of BWW or no additional intervention. The primary outcome is recovery at 3?months as measured by the Recovery Assessment Scale-revised (RAS-r). Secondary outcomes include symptoms of depression and anxiety measured with the Personal Health Questionnaire-9 item (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-7 item (GAD-7) respectively, quality of life measured with the EQ-5D-5L, and community integration assessed with the Community Integration Questionnaire. Cost-effectiveness evaluations will account for the cost of the intervention and direct health care costs. Qualitative interviews with participants and stakeholders will be conducted throughout. Discussion Understanding the impact of virtual strategies, such as BWW, on patient outcomes and experience, and health system costs is essential for informing whether and how health system decision-makers can support these strategies system-wide. This requires clear evidence of effectiveness and an understanding of how the intervention works, for whom, and under what circumstances. This study will produce such effectiveness data for BWW, while simultaneously exploring the characteristics and experiences of users for whom this and similar online interventions could be helpful. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02896894 . Registered on 31 August 2016 (retrospectively registered).
机译:背景技术精神疾病是全球疾病负担的重要且不断增加的贡献者。然而,精神卫生保健的获得和利用受到结构性障碍的限制,例如专业人员的可获得性,时间,自付费用以及态度障碍,包括污名。虚拟护理等创新解决方案正在迅速进入医疗保健领域。但是,在缺乏针对持续性和传播的严格评估和适当计划的情况下,通常会促进和采用虚拟护理来促进心理健康。方法一项实用的随机对照试验,其中包含嵌套的比较有效性研究组,并同时进行了现实主义过程评估,以检查大白墙(BWW)在线平台在年龄较大的个体中进行心理健康自我管理和同伴支持的可接受性,有效性和成本效益。 16岁及16岁以上的人正在加拿大安大略省获得心理健康服务。参与者将被随机分配至3个月的BWW或照常治疗。在3个月末,干预小组的参与者将有机会选择参加干预扩展小组。那些选择加入的人将被随机分配接受额外的3个月的BWW或不进行其他干预。主要结果是根据修订的恢复评估量表(RAS-r)测量的3个月时的恢复。次要结局包括分别使用个人健康问卷9项(PHQ-9)和广义焦虑症问卷7项(GAD-7)评估的抑郁和焦虑症状,用EQ-5D-5L评估的生活质量,社区融合问卷进行评估。成本效益评估将考虑干预成本和直接医疗成本。整个过程将对参与者和利益相关者进行定性访谈。讨论了解虚拟策略(例如BWW)对患者结果和经验以及卫生系统成本的影响,对于告知卫生系统决策者是否以及如何能够在全系统范围内支持这些策略至关重要。这需要有效的明确证据,并且需要了解干预的工作方式,针对的对象以及在何种情况下进行。这项研究将为BWW产生此类有效性数据,同时探索用户的特征和经验,这些用户和类似的在线干预可能会对他们有所帮助。试用注册Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02896894。 2016年8月31日注册(追溯注册)。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号