...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychiatry >What’s all the talk about? Topic modelling in a mental health Internet support group
【24h】

What’s all the talk about? Topic modelling in a mental health Internet support group

机译:到底在说什么心理健康互联网支持小组中的主题建模

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background The majority of content in an Internet Support Group (ISG) is contributed by 1?% of the users (‘super users’). Computational methods, such as topic modelling, can provide a large-scale quantitative objective description of this content. Such methods may provide a new perspective on the nature of engagement on ISGs including the role of super users and their possible effect on other users. Methods A topic model was computed for all posts ( N =?131,004) in the ISG BlueBoard using Latent Dirichlet Allocation. A model containing 25 topics was selected on the basis of intelligibility as determined by diagnostic metrics and qualitative investigation. This model yielded 21 substantive topics for further analysis. Two chi-square tests were conducted separately for each topic to ascertain: (i) if the odds of super users’ and other users’ posting differed for each topic; and (ii) if for super users the odds of posting differed depending on whether the response was to a super user or to another user. Results The 21 substantive topics covered a range of issues related to mental health and peer-support. There were significantly higher odds that super users wrote content on 13 topics, with the greatest effects being for Parenting Role (OR [95%CI]?=?7.97 [7.85–8.10]), Co-created Fiction (4.22 [4.17–4.27]), Mental Illness (3.13 [3.11–3.16]) and Positive Change (2.82 [2.79–2.84]). There were significantly lower odds for super users on 7 topics, with the greatest effects being for the topics Depression (OR?=?0.27 [0.27–0.28]), Medication (0.36 [0.36–0.37]), Therapy (0.55 [0.54–0.55]) and Anxiety (0.55 [0.55–0.55]). However, super users were significantly more likely to write content on 5 out of these 7 topics when responding to other users than when responding to fellow super users. Conclusions The findings suggest that super users serve the role of emotionally supportive companions with a focus on topics broadly resembling the consumer/carer model of recovery. Other users engage in topics with a greater focus on experiential knowledge, disclosure and informational support, a pattern resembling the clinical symptom-focussed approach to recovery. However, super users modify their content in response to other users in a manner consistent with being ‘active help providers’.
机译:背景技术Internet支持组(ISG)中的大部分内容由1%的用户(“超级用户”)贡献。计算方法(例如主题建模)可以提供对此内容的大规模定量客观描述。此类方法可以提供有关ISG参与性质的新视角,包括超级用户的角色及其对其他用户的可能影响。方法使用潜在Dirichlet分配为ISG BlueBoard中的所有帖子(N =?131,004)计算主题模型。根据诊断指标和定性研究确定的清晰度,选择了一个包含25个主题的模型。该模型产生了21个实质性主题,需要进一步分析。针对每个主题分别进行了两次卡方检验,以确定:(i)每个主题的超级用户和其他用户发布的几率是否不同; (ii)对于超级用户,发帖的几率取决于响应是发给超级用户还是其他用户而有所不同。结果21个实质性主题涵盖了与心理健康和同伴支持有关的一系列问题。超级用户在13个主题上写内容的几率明显更高,其中最大的影响是育儿角色(OR [95%CI]?=?7.97 [7.85-8.10]),共同创作的小说(4.22 [4.17-4.27] ]),心理疾病(3.13 [3.11-3.16])和正向变化(2.82 [2.79-2.84])。超级用户在7个主题上的几率明显较低,其中最大的影响是抑郁(OR?=?0.27 [0.27–0.28]),药物治疗(0.36 [0.36-0.37]),治疗(0.55 [0.54– 0.55]和焦虑(0.55 [0.55-0.55])。但是,与其他超级用户相比,超级用户在回应其他用户时更有可能在这7个主题中的5个主题上编写内容。结论研究结果表明,超级用户扮演着情感支持同伴的角色,重点关注与消费者/护理者康复模式大致相似的主题。其他用户参与的主题则更多地集中在体验知识,披露和信息支持上,这种模式类似于以临床症状为中心的康复方法。但是,超级用户会以与“主动帮助提供者”一致的方式来修改其内容,以响应其他用户。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号