首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Randomized controlled pilot of a group antenatal care model and the sociodemographic factors associated with pregnancy-related empowerment in sub-Saharan Africa
【24h】

Randomized controlled pilot of a group antenatal care model and the sociodemographic factors associated with pregnancy-related empowerment in sub-Saharan Africa

机译:撒哈拉以南非洲地区一组产前护理模型和与妊娠相关赋权相关的社会人口统计学因素的随机对照试验

获取原文
       

摘要

The links between empowerment and a number of health-related outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa have been documented, but empowerment related to pregnancy is under-investigated. Antenatal care (ANC) is the entry point into the healthcare system for most women, so it is important to understand how ANC affects aspects of women’s sense of control over their pregnancy. We compare pregnancy-related empowerment for women randomly assigned to the standard of care versus CenteringPregnancy-based group ANC (intervention) in two sub-Saharan countries, Malawi and Tanzania. Pregnant women in Malawi (n?=?112) and Tanzania (n?=?110) were recruited into a pilot study and randomized to individual ANC or group ANC. Retention at late pregnancy was 81% in Malawi and 95% in Tanzania. In both countries, individual ANC, termed focused antenatal care (FANC), is the standard of care. FANC recommends four ANC visits plus a 6-week post-birth visit and is implemented following the country's standard of care. In group ANC, each contact included self- and midwife-assessments in group space and 90?minutes of interactive health promotion. The number of contacts was the same for both study conditions. We measured pregnancy-related empowerment in late pregnancy using the Pregnancy-Related Empowerment Scale (PRES). Independent samples t-tests and multiple linear regressions were employed to assess whether group ANC led to higher PRES scores than individual ANC and to investigate other sociodemographic factors related to pregnancy-related empowerment. In Malawi, women in group ANC had higher PRES scores than those in individual ANC. Type of care was a significant predictor of PRES and explained 67% of the variation. This was not so in Tanzania; PRES scores were similar for both types of care. Predictive models including sociodemographic variables showed religion as a potential moderator of treatment effect in Tanzania. Muslim women in group ANC had a higher mean PRES score than those in individual ANC; a difference not observed among Christian women. Group ANC empowers pregnant women in some contexts. More research is needed to identify the ways that models of ANC can affect pregnancy-related empowerment in addition to perinatal outcomes globally.
机译:在撒哈拉以南非洲,赋权与许多与健康相关的结果之间的联系已有文件记载,但与怀孕有关的赋权却未得到充分研究。产前保健(ANC)是大多数女性进入医疗保健系统的切入点,因此了解ANC如何影响女性对怀孕的控制感至关重要。我们比较了在两个撒哈拉以南非洲国家(马拉维和坦桑尼亚)中,随机分配到护理标准的妇女与以CenteringPregnancy为基础的ANC(干预)组相关的妇女与妊娠相关的赋权。招募了马拉维(n = 112)和坦桑尼亚(n = 110)的孕妇参加试点研究,并随机分配给单个ANC或ANC组。马拉维妊娠晚期的保留率为81%,坦桑尼亚为95%。在这两个国家中,被称为重点产前护理(FANC)的个体ANC是护理的标准。 FANC建议进行4次ANC访问,再进行6周的产后访问,并按照该国的护理标准实施。在ANC小组中,每个联系人都在小组空间中进行自我和助产士评估,并进行90分钟的互动式健康促进。两种研究条件下的接触次数相同。我们使用妊娠相关能力量表(PRES)来测量妊娠晚期的妊娠相关能力。采用独立样本t检验和多元线性回归来评估ANC组是否比个人ANC导致更高的PRES评分,并调查与妊娠相关授权相关的其他社会人口统计学因素。在马拉维,ANC组的女性的PRES评分高于单个ANC中的女性。护理类型是PRES的重要预测指标,并解释了67%的差异。在坦桑尼亚情况并非如此。两种护理的PRES评分均相似。包括社会人口统计学变量的预测模型显示,宗教是坦桑尼亚治疗效果的潜在调节剂。 ANC组的穆斯林妇女的PRES平均得分高于单个ANC中的穆斯林妇女。基督教妇女之间没有观察到差异。 ANC集团在某些情况下为孕妇赋权。除全球围产期结局外,还需要开展更多研究来确定ANC模型可以如何影响与妊娠相关的赋权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号