...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Weighing as a stand-alone intervention does not reduce excessive gestational weight gain compared to routine antenatal care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
【24h】

Weighing as a stand-alone intervention does not reduce excessive gestational weight gain compared to routine antenatal care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

机译:与常规的产前检查相比,称量为独立干预不会减少过多的妊娠体重:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文

摘要

Background Excessive gestational weight gain is associated with short and long-term adverse maternal and infant health outcomes, independent of pre-pregnancy body mass index. Weighing pregnant women as a stand-alone intervention during antenatal visits is suggested to reduce pregnancy weight gain. In the absence of effective interventions to reduce excessive gestational gain within the real world setting, this study aims to test if routine weighing as a stand-alone intervention can reduce total pregnancy weight gain and, in particular, excessive gestational weight gain. Methods A systematic review and meta–analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted between November 2014 and January 2016, and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Seven databases were searched. A priori eligibility criteria were applied to published literature by at least two independent reviewers. Studies considered methodologically rigorous, as per the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Criteria Checklist for Primary Research, were included. Meta-analysis was conducted using fixed-effects models. Results A total of 5223 (non-duplicated) records were screened, resulting in two RCTs that were pooled for meta-analysis ( n =?1068 randomised participants; n =?538 intervention, n =?534 control). No difference in total weight gain per week was observed between intervention and control groups (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.00?kg/week, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.03 to 0.02). There was also no reduction in excessive gestational weight gain between intervention and control, according to pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI). However, total weight gain was lower in underweight women ( n =?23, BMI?2) in the intervention compared to control group (?0.12?kg/week, 95% CI ?0.23 to ?0.01). No significant differences were observed for other pregnancy, birth and infant outcomes. Conclusion Weighing as a stand-alone intervention is not worse nor better at reducing excessive gestational weight gain than routine antenatal care.
机译:背景妊娠期体重增加过多与短期和长期不利的母婴健康结局有关,而与孕前体重指数无关。建议在产前检查时将孕妇称重作为独立干预措施,以减少孕妇体重增加。在现实环境中,在缺乏有效的干预措施以减少妊娠过多的妊娠的情况下,本研究旨在测试将常规体重作为独立干预措施是否可以减少总的妊娠体重增加,尤其是可以减少妊娠体重的增加。方法2014年11月至2016年1月,对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,并使用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行了报告。搜索了七个数据库。至少有两个独立的审阅者将先验资格标准应用于已发表的文献。根据初步研究的营养和营养学质量标准清单,包括了方法学上严格的研究。使用固定效应模型进行荟萃分析。结果共筛选了5223条记录(无重复),收集了两个RCT进行荟萃分析(n =?1068随机参与者; n =?538干预,n =?534对照)。干预组和对照组之间每周总体重增加没有差异(加权平均差异(WMD)-0.00?kg /周,95%置信区间(CI)-0.03至0.02)。根据孕前体重指数(BMI),干预与对照之间的妊娠期体重增加也没有减少。然而,与对照组相比,干预组中体重过轻的妇女(n =?23,BMI?2 )的总增重较低(?0.12?kg /周,95%CI?0.23至?0.01)。其他妊娠,出生和婴儿结局均未观察到显着差异。结论称重作为独立干预措施在减少妊娠期体重增加方面并没有比常规的产前检查更好或更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号