首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Does induction of labor for constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetuses identified in utero reduce maternal morbidity?
【24h】

Does induction of labor for constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetuses identified in utero reduce maternal morbidity?

机译:在子宫内为体格较大的胎龄胎儿引产是否会降低孕产妇发病率?

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background The number of infants with a birth weight?>?97th percentile for gestational age has increased over the years. Although some studies have examined the interest of inducing labor for fetuses with macrosomia suspected in utero, only a few have analyzed this suspected macrosomia according to estimated weight at each gestational age. Most studies have focused principally on neonatal rather than on maternal (and still less on perineal) outcomes. The principal aim of this study was to assess whether a policy of induction of labor for women with a constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetus might reduce the occurrence of severe perineal tears; the secondary aims of this work were to assess whether this policy would reduce either recourse to cesarean delivery during labor or neonatal complications. Methods This historical cohort study (n?=?3077) analyzed records from a French perinatal database. Women without diabetes and with a cephalic singleton term pregnancy were eligible for the study. We excluded medically indicated terminations of pregnancy and in utero fetal deaths. Among the pregnancies with fetuses suspected, before birth, of being large-for-gestational-age, we compared those for whom labor was induced from?≥?37?weeks to?≤?38?weeks+ 6 days (n?=?199) to those with expectant obstetrical management (n?=?2878). In this intention-to-treat analysis, results were expressed as crude and adjusted relative risks. Results The mean birth weight was 4012?g?±?421?g. The rate of perineal lesions did not differ between the two groups in either primiparas (aRR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.86-1.31) or multiparas (aRR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.84-1.05). Similarly, neither the cesarean rate (aRR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.82-1.50) nor the risks of resuscitation in the delivery room or of death in the delivery room or in the immediate postpartum or of neonatal transfer to the NICU (aRR?=?0.94; 95% CI: 0.59-1.50) differed between the two groups. Conclusions A policy of induction of labor for women with a constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetus among women without diabetes does not reduce maternal morbidity.
机译:背景技术多年来,出生体重≥97%的婴儿的数量有所增加。尽管一些研究检查了在子宫内怀疑有巨人症的胎儿引产的兴趣,但只有少数人根据每个胎龄的估计体重分析了这种可疑的巨人症。大多数研究主要集中于新生儿,而不是产妇(会阴)。这项研究的主要目的是评估针对体格较大的胎儿的妇女引产政策是否可以减少严重会阴泪的发生。这项工作的次要目的是评估这项政策是否会减少分娩时剖宫产或新生儿并发症的发生。方法这项历史队列研究(n = 3077)分析了法国围产期数据库中的记录。没有糖尿病且单胎头痛足月妊娠的妇女有资格参加研究。我们排除了医学上表明的终止妊娠和宫内胎儿死亡的机会。在怀疑胎儿出生前怀孕的大胎龄中,我们比较了从≥37天到≤38周 + 6天引产的胎儿。 sup>(n?=?199)给予预期产科管理人员(n?=?2878)。在此意向性分析中,结果表示为粗略的和调整后的相对风险。结果平均出生体重为4012?g?±?421?g。两组的会阴部病变率在初产妇(aRR:1.06; 95%CI:0.86-1.31)或多产妇(aRR:0.94; 95%CI:0.84-1.05)中无差异。同样,剖宫产率(aRR:1.11; 95%CI:0.82-1.50)或分娩室中复苏的危险,分娩室中或产后立即死亡或新生儿转移至新生儿重症监护病房(aRR? =?0.94; 95%CI:0.59-1.50)在两组之间存在差异。结论在没有糖尿病的女性中,对于妊娠期体质较大的女性,引产政策不会降低孕产妇的发病率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号