首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Evidence-based obstetrics in four hospitals in China: An observational study to explore clinical practice, women's preferences and provider's views
【24h】

Evidence-based obstetrics in four hospitals in China: An observational study to explore clinical practice, women's preferences and provider's views

机译:中国四家医院的循证妇产科:一项观察性研究,旨在探索临床实践,女性偏爱和提供者的观点

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Evidence-based obstetric care is widely promoted in developing countries, but the success of implementation is not known. Using selected childbirth care procedures in four hospitals in Shanghai, we compared practice against evidence-based information, and explored user and provider views about each procedure. Methods Observational study. Using the Cochrane Library, we identified six procedures that should be avoided as routine and two that should be encouraged. Procedure rate determined by exit interviews with women, verified using hospital notes. Views of women and providers explored with in depth interviews. The study sites were three hospitals in Shanghai and one in neighbouring province of Jiangsu. 150 women at each centre for procedure rate, and 48 in-depth interviews with women and providers. Results Vaginal births were 50% (303/599) of the total. Of the six practices where evidence suggests they should be avoided as routine, three were performed with rates above 70%: pubic shaving (3 hospitals), rectal examination (3 hospitals), and episiotomy (3 hospitals). Most women delivered lying down, pain relief was rarely given, and only in the urban district hospital did women routinely have a companion. Most women wanted support or companionship during labour and to be given pain relief; but current practice is insufficient to meet women's needs. Conclusion Obstetric practice is not following best available evidence in the hospitals studied. There is a need to adjust hospital policy to support the use of interventions proven to be of benefit to women during childbirth, and develop approaches that ensure clinical practice changes.
机译:背景技术循证产科护理在发展中国家得到了广泛的推广,但实施的成功性尚不清楚。使用上海四家医院的精选分娩护理程序,我们将实践与基于证据的信息进行了比较,并探讨了用户和提供者对每种程序的看法。方法观察性研究。使用Cochrane库,我们确定了应避免在日常工作中避免的六个过程和应鼓励的两个过程。出诊率由女性出院访谈确定,并使用医院记录进行验证。通过深入访谈探讨了妇女和提供者的观点。研究地点是上海的三所医院和江苏省的一所医院。每个中心有150名妇女接受手术,并且对妇女和提供者进行了48次深入访谈。结果阴道分娩占总数的50%(303/599)。在有证据表明应常规避免使用的六种做法中,有三项以高于70%的比率进行:耻骨剃须(3所医院),直肠检查(3所医院)和会阴切开术(3所医院)。大多数妇女分娩时都是躺着的,很少能减轻疼痛,只有在市区医院,妇女才经常有伴侣。大多数妇女希望在分娩过程中获得支持或陪伴,以减轻疼痛;但是目前的做法不足以满足女性的需求。结论在所研究的医院中,产科实践并未遵循最佳的现有证据。有必要调整医院政策,以支持使用分娩过程中对妇女有益的干预措施,并制定确保临床实践发生变化的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号