...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Midwives’ perceptions on using a fetoscope and Doppler for fetal heart rate assessments during labor: a qualitative study in rural Tanzania
【24h】

Midwives’ perceptions on using a fetoscope and Doppler for fetal heart rate assessments during labor: a qualitative study in rural Tanzania

机译:助产士对使用分娩仪和多普勒仪进行分娩时胎儿心率评估的看法:坦桑尼亚农村地区的一项定性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

The Doppler is thought to be more comfortable and effective compared to the fetoscope for assessing the fetal heart rate (FHR) during labor. However, in a rural Tanzanian hospital, midwives who had easy access to both devices mostly used fetoscope. This study explored midwives’ perception of factors influencing their preference for using either a Pinard fetoscope or a FreePlay wind-up Doppler for intermittent FHR monitoring. Midwives who had worked for at least 6?months in the labor ward were recruited. Focus group discussion (FGD) was used to collect data. Five FGDs were conducted between December 2015 and February 2016. Qualitative content analysis was employed using NVivo 11.0. Three main themes emerged as factors perceived by midwives as influencing their preference; 1) Sufficient training and experience with using a device; Midwives had been using fetoscopes since their midwifery training, and they had vast experience using it. The Doppler was recently introduced in the maternity ward, and midwives had insufficient training in how to use it. 2) Ability of the device to produce reliable measurements; Using a fetoscope, one must listen for the heartbeat, count using a watch, and calculate, the Doppler provides both a display and sound of the FHR. Fetoscope measurements are prone to human errors, and Doppler measurements are prone to instrumental errors. 3) Convenience of use and comfort of a device; Fetoscopes do not need charging, and while it is possible to “personalize/hide” the measurements, and may be painful for mothers. Dopplers need charging and do not cause pain, but provide limited privacy. Midwives’ preferences of FHR monitoring devices are influenced by the level of device training, experience with using a device, reliable measurements, and convenience and comfort during use. Fetoscopes and Dopplers should be equally available during midwifery training and in clinical practice.
机译:与胎儿镜相比,多普勒仪在产程中评估胎儿心率(FHR)时更舒适,更有效。但是,在坦桑尼亚的一家乡村医院中,可以轻松使用这两种设备的助产士大多使用了胎儿镜。这项研究探讨了助产士对于使用皮纳德(Pinard)胎儿镜或FreePlay缠绕多普勒仪进行间歇性FHR监测的因素的看法。招募了在劳动病房工作了至少六个月的助产士。焦点小组讨论(FGD)用于收集数据。在2015年12月至2016年2月之间进行了五次烟气脱硫。使用NVivo 11.0进行了定性含量分析。三个主要主题成为助产士认为影响他们偏好的因素。 1)使用设备的充分培训和经验;自助产士培训以来,助产士一直在使用胎儿镜,他们在使用它方面拥有丰富的经验。多普勒仪最近被引入产科病房,助产士对其使用方法的培训不足。 2)设备产生可靠测量结果的能力;使用fetoscope,人们必须聆听心跳,使用手表进行计数并进行计算,多普勒仪同时提供FHR的显示和声音。胎儿镜测量容易出现人为错误,多普勒测量容易出现仪器错误。 3)使用方便和舒适;胎儿镜不需要充电,虽然可以“个性化/隐藏”测量值,但可能会使母亲感到痛苦。多普勒需要充电并且不会引起疼痛,但是提供了有限的隐私。助产士对FHR监测设备的偏爱受设备培训水平,使用设备的经验,可靠的测量以及使用过程中的便利性和舒适性的影响。在助产士培训期间和临床实践中,应同时使用胎儿镜和多普勒仪。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号