首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing
【24h】

Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing

机译:产前检查问卷的质量:仪器开发和测试

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Utilization indices exist to measure quantity of prenatal care, but currently there is no published instrument to assess quality of prenatal care. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a new instrument, the Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire (QPCQ). Methods Data for this instrument development study were collected in five Canadian cities. Items for the QPCQ were generated through interviews with 40 pregnant women and 40 health care providers and a review of prenatal care guidelines, followed by assessment of content validity and rating of importance of items. The preliminary 100-item QPCQ was administered to 422 postpartum women to conduct item reduction using exploratory factor analysis. The final 46-item version of the QPCQ was then administered to another 422 postpartum women to establish its construct validity, and internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Results Exploratory factor analysis reduced the QPCQ to 46 items, factored into 6 subscales, which subsequently were validated by confirmatory factor analysis. Construct validity was also demonstrated using a hypothesis testing approach; there was a significant positive association between women’s ratings of the quality of prenatal care and their satisfaction with care (r?=?0.81). Convergent validity was demonstrated by a significant positive correlation (r?=?0.63) between the “Support and Respect” subscale of the QPCQ and the “Respectfulness/Emotional Support” subscale of the Prenatal Interpersonal Processes of Care instrument. The overall QPCQ had acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha?=?0.96), as did each of the subscales. The test-retest reliability result (Intra-class correlation coefficient?=?0.88) indicated stability of the instrument on repeat administration approximately one week later. Temporal stability testing confirmed that women’s ratings of their quality of prenatal care did not change as a result of giving birth or between the early postpartum period and 4 to 6?weeks postpartum. Conclusion The QPCQ is a valid and reliable instrument that will be useful in future research as an outcome measure to compare quality of care across geographic regions, populations, and service delivery models, and to assess the relationship between quality of care and maternal and infant health outcomes.
机译:背景技术存在利用指数来测量产前保健的数量,但是目前没有公开的工具来评估产前保健的质量。这项研究的目的是开发和测试一种新的工具,即产前检查问卷质量(QPCQ)。方法该仪器开发研究的数据收集于加拿大的五个城市。 QPCQ的项目是通过与40名孕妇和40名医疗保健提供者进行访谈并审查了产前护理指南而产生的,然后评估内容的有效性和项目重要性的等级。初步的100项QPCQ已对422名产后妇女进行了使用探索性因素分析的项目减少。然后将QPCQ的最终46个项目版本管理给另外422名产后妇女,以建立其结构效度,内部一致性和重测信度。结果探索性因素分析将QPCQ减少到46个项目,分为6个子量表,随后通过验证性因素分析进行​​了验证。还使用假设检验方法证明了结构的有效性。妇女对产前护理质量的评价与她们对护理的满意度之间存在显着的正相关(r = 0.81)。 QPCQ的“支持和尊重”子量表与产前人际关怀过程工具的“尊重/情感支持”子量表之间显着正相关(r = 0.63),证明了聚合效度。整个QPCQ具有可接受的内部一致性可靠性(Cronbach's alpha?=?0.96),每个分量表也是如此。重测信度结果(类内相关系数β= 0.88)表明该器械在大约一周后重复给药时的稳定性。时间稳定性测试证实,妇女对产前护理质量的评分并未因分娩而有所变化,或在产后早期至产后4至6周之间没有变化。结论QPCQ是一种有效且可靠的工具,将在以后的研究中用作比较跨地理区域,人群和服务提供模式的护理质量,以及评估护理质量与母婴健康之间关系的结果度量方法结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号