首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >The association between attendance of midwives and workload of midwives with the mode of birth: secondary analyses in the German healthcare system
【24h】

The association between attendance of midwives and workload of midwives with the mode of birth: secondary analyses in the German healthcare system

机译:助产士的出勤与助产士的工作量与分娩方式之间的关联:德国医疗体系中的二级分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The continuous rise in caesarean rates across most European countries raises multiple concerns. One factor in this development might be the type of care women receive during childbirth. ‘Supportive care during labour’ by midwives could be an important factor for reducing fear, tension and pain and decreasing caesarean rates. The presence and availability of midwives to support a woman in line with her needs are central aspects for ‘supportive care during labour’. To date, there is no existing research on the influence of effective ‘supportive care’ by German midwives on the mode of birth. This study examines the association between the attendance and workload of midwives with the mode of birth outcomes in a population of low-risk women in a German multicentre sample. Methods The data are based on a prospective controlled multicentre trial (n?=?1,238) in which the intervention ‘midwife-led care’ was introduced. Four German hospitals participated between 2007 and 2009. Secondary analyses included a convenience sample of 999 low-risk women from the primary analyses who met the selection criterion ‘low-risk status’. Participation was voluntary. The association between the mode of birth and the key variables ‘attendance of midwives’ and ‘workload of midwives’ was assessed using backward logistic regression models. Results The overall rate of spontaneous delivery was 80.7% (n?=?763). The ‘attendance of midwives’ and the ‘workload of midwives’ did not exhibit a significant association with the mode of birth. However, women who were not satisfied with the presence of midwives (OR: 2.45, 95% CI 1.54-3.95) or who did not receive supportive procedures by midwives (OR: 3.01, 95% CI 1.50-6.05) were significantly more likely to experience operative delivery or a caesarean. Further explanatory variables include the type of hospital, participation in childbirth preparation class, length of stay from admission to birth, oxytocin usage and parity. Conclusion Satisfaction with the presence of and supportive procedures by midwives are associated with the mode of birth. The presence and behaviour of midwives should suit the woman’s expectations and fulfil her needs. For reasons of causality, we would recommend experimental or quasi-experimental research that would exceed the explorative character of this study.
机译:背景多数欧洲国家剖腹产率的持续上升引起了许多关注。这种发展的一个因素可能是妇女在分娩期间接受的护理类型。助产士提供的“分娩期间支持治疗”可能是减轻恐惧,紧张和痛苦并降低剖腹产率的重要因素。符合妇女需要的助产士的存在和可用性是“分娩期间支持护理”的主要方面。迄今为止,尚无关于德国助产士有效“支持性护理”对分娩方式的影响的现有研究。这项研究在德国多中心样本中研究了低危妇女群体中助产士的出勤率和工作量与分娩方式之间的关系。方法这些数据基于一项前瞻性对照多中心试验(n = 1,238),其中引入了“助产士主导的护理”干预措施。 2007年至2009年之间,有四家德国医院参加了该研究。二级分析包括来自便利店的999名低风险妇女的便利样本,这些妇女符合选择标准“低风险状态”。参与是自愿的。使用后向逻辑回归模型评估了出生方式与关键变量“助产士的出勤”和“助产士的工作量”之间的关联。结果总的自发分娩率为80.7%(n?=?763)。 “助产士的出勤”和“助产士的工作量”与分娩方式没有显着关联。但是,对助产士的存在不满意的女性(OR:2.45,95%CI 1.54-3.95)或未通过助产士接受支持手术的女性(OR:3.01,95%CI 1.50-6.05)明显更容易经历手术分娩或剖腹产。进一步的解释性变量包括医院的类型,参加分娩准备的班级,从入院到出生的住院时间,催产素的使用和均等。结论对助产士的满意程度和助产程序与分娩方式有关。助产士的存在和行为应符合女性的期望并满足其需求。出于因果关系的原因,我们建议进行超出本研究探索性质的实验或半实验研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号