...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Neuroscience >Distributed representations of the 'preparatory set' in the frontal oculomotor system: a TMS study
【24h】

Distributed representations of the 'preparatory set' in the frontal oculomotor system: a TMS study

机译:额叶动眼系统中“准备组”的分布式表示:TMS研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background The generation of saccades is influenced by the level of "preparatory set activity" in cortical oculomotor areas. This preparatory activity can be examined using the gap-paradigm in which a temporal gap is introduced between the disappearance of a central fixation target and the appearance of an eccentric target. Methods Ten healthy subjects made horizontal pro- or antisaccades in response to lateralized cues after a gap period of 200 ms. Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), frontal eye field (FEF), or supplementary eye field (SEF) of the right hemisphere 100 or 200 ms after the disappearance of the fixation point. Saccade latencies were measured to probe the disruptive effect of TMS on saccade preparation. In six individuals, we gave realistic sham TMS during the gap period to mimic auditory and somatosensory stimulation without stimulating the cortex. Results TMS to DLPFC, FEF, or SEF increased the latencies of contraversive pro- and antisaccades. This TMS-induced delay of saccade initiation was particularly evident in conditions with a relatively high level of preparatory set activity: The increase in saccade latency was more pronounced at the end of the gap period and when participants prepared for prosaccades rather than antisaccades. Although the "lesion effect" of TMS was stronger with prefrontal TMS, TMS to FEF or SEF also interfered with the initiation of saccades. The delay in saccade onset induced by real TMS was not caused by non-specific effects because sham stimulation shortened the latencies of contra- and ipsiversive anti-saccades, presumably due to intersensory facilitation. Conclusion Our results are compatible with the view that the "preparatory set" for contraversive saccades is represented in a distributed cortical network, including the contralateral DLPFC, FEF and SEF.
机译:背景技术扫视的产生受皮质动眼运动区域中“预备活动”水平的影响。可以使用间隙范例检查这种准备活动,其中在中央注视目标的消失和偏心目标的出现之间引入了时间间隙。方法十名健康受试者在200毫秒的间隙后对侧向提示做出水平前扫视或反扫视。在固定点消失后100或200 ms,将单脉冲经颅磁刺激(TMS)应用于右半球的背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC),额眼场(FEF)或补充眼场(SEF)。测量扫视潜伏期以探测TMS对扫视准备的破坏作用。在六个个体中,我们在间隔期进行了真实的假TMS,以模拟听觉和体感刺激而不刺激皮层。结果TMS转换为DLPFC,FEF或SEF会增加前向和后向矛盾的潜伏期。在准备活动相对较高的情况下,这种TMS引起的扫视延迟的延迟特别明显:在间隙期结束时,以及参与者准备进行扫视而非反扫视时,扫视潜伏期的增加更为明显。尽管前额叶TMS对TMS的“损伤作用”更强,但TMS对FEF或SEF的影响也与扫视的发生有关。真正的TMS引起的扫视镜发作延迟不是由非特异性效应引起的,因为假想刺激缩短了对视和全视听觉抗视镜的潜伏期,这大概是由于感官间的促进作用。结论我们的结果与这样的观点是一致的,即,对立扫视的“准备集”在分布式皮质网络中表示,包括对侧DLPFC,FEF和SEF。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号