...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pediatrics >Analgesic antipyretic use among young children in the TEDDY study: no association with islet autoimmunity
【24h】

Analgesic antipyretic use among young children in the TEDDY study: no association with islet autoimmunity

机译:TEDDY研究显示,年幼儿童使用镇痛退热药与胰岛自身免疫性无关

获取原文

摘要

Background The use of analgesic antipyretics (ANAP) in children have long been a matter of controversy. Data on their practical use on an individual level has, however, been scarce. There are indications of possible effects on glucose homeostasis and immune function related to the use of ANAP. The aim of this study was to analyze patterns of analgesic antipyretic use across the clinical centers of The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) prospective cohort study and test if ANAP use was a risk factor for islet autoimmunity. Methods Data were collected for 8542 children in the first 2.5?years of life. Incidence was analyzed using logistic regression with country and first child status as independent variables. Holm’s procedure was used to adjust for multiplicity of intercountry comparisons. Time to autoantibody seroconversion was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model with cumulative analgesic use as primary time dependent covariate of interest. For each categorization, a generalized estimating equation (GEE) approach was used. Results Higher prevalence of ANAP use was found in the U.S. (95.7%) and Sweden (94.8%) compared to Finland (78.1%) and Germany (80.2%). First-born children were more commonly given acetaminophen (OR 1.26; 95% CI 1.07, 1.49; p =?0.007) but less commonly Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAID) (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.78, 0.95; p =?0.002). Acetaminophen and NSAID use in the absence of fever and infection was more prevalent in the U.S. (40.4%; 26.3% of doses) compared to Sweden, Finland and Germany ( p Conclusions ANAP use in young children is not a risk factor for seroconversion by age 6?years. Use of ANAP is widespread in young children, and significantly higher in the U.S. compared to other study sites, where use is common also in absence of fever and infection.
机译:背景技术在儿童中使用止痛退烧药(ANAP)一直是一个有争议的问题。然而,关于它们在个人层面上的实际使用的数据却很少。有迹象表明,与使用ANAP有关的葡萄糖稳态和免疫功能可能受到影响。这项研究的目的是分析年轻糖尿病患者环境决定因素(TEDDY)前瞻性队列研究的临床中心中止痛解热药的使用方式,并测试使用ANAP是否是胰岛自身免疫性疾病的危险因素。方法收集了出生后2.5年的8542名儿童的数据。使用国家和第一个孩子的状况作为自变量的逻辑回归分析发病率。霍尔姆的程序用于调整国家间比较的多样性。使用Cox比例风险模型分析了自身抗体血清转化的时间,其中累积镇痛药的使用是主要的时间依赖性协变量。对于每种分类,都使用广义估计方程(GEE)方法。结果在美国(95.7%)和瑞典(94.8%)中发现使用ANAP的患病率高于芬兰(78.1%)和德国(80.2%)。第一胎婴儿更常使用对乙酰氨基酚(OR 1.26; 95%CI 1.07,1.49; p =?0.007),但非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)较少(OR 0.86; 95%CI 0.78,0.95; p =?0.002)。与瑞典,芬兰和德国相比,在没有发热和感染的情况下使用对乙酰氨基酚和NSAID在美国更为普遍(40.4%;占剂量的26.3%)(p结论在幼儿中使用ANAP并不是按年龄进行血清转化的危险因素6年:ANAP在幼儿中广泛使用,在美国,与其他在没有发烧和感染的情况下也很常见的研究地点相比,美国的使用率要高得多。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号