...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Neurology >Management of breakthrough disease in patients with multiple sclerosis: when an increasing of Interferon beta dose should be effective?
【24h】

Management of breakthrough disease in patients with multiple sclerosis: when an increasing of Interferon beta dose should be effective?

机译:多发性硬化症患者的突破性疾病管理:何时增加干扰素β剂量应有效?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background In daily clinical setting, some patients affected by relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) are switched from the low-dose to the high-dose Interferon beta (IFNB) in order to achieve a better control of the disease. Purpose In this observational, post-marketing study we reported the 2-year clinical outcomes of patients switched to the high-dose IFNB; we also evaluated whether different criteria adopted to switch patients had an influence on the clinical outcomes. Methods Patients affected by RRMS and switched from the low-dose to the high-dose IFNB due to the occurrence of relapses, or contrast-enhancing lesions (CELs) as detected by yearly scheduled MRI scans, were followed for two years. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores, as well as clinical relapses, were evaluated during the follow-up period. Results We identified 121 patients switched to the high-dose IFNB. One hundred patients increased the IFNB dose because of the occurrence of one or more relapses, and 21 because of the presence of one or more CELs, even in absence of clinical relapses. At the end of the 2-year follow-up, 72 (59.5%) patients had a relapse, and 51 (42.1%) reached a sustained progression on EDSS score. Overall, 85 (70.3%) patients showed some clinical disease activity (i.e. relapses or disability progression) after the switch. Relapse risk after increasing the IFNB dose was greater in patients who switched because of relapses than those switched only for MRI activity (HR: 5.55, p = 0.001). A high EDSS score (HR: 1.77, p Conclusion In the majority of MS patients, switching from the low-dose to the high-dose IFNB did not reduce the risk of further relapses or increased disability in the 2-year follow period. Although we observed that patients who switched only on the basis on MRI activity (even in absence of clinical attacks) had a lower risk of further relapses, larger studies are warranted before to recommend a switch algorithm based on MRI findings.
机译:背景技术在日常临床环境中,一些患有复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)的患者从低剂量转为大剂量干扰素β(IFNB),以便更好地控制疾病。目的在这项观察性的上市后研究中,我们报告了转用大剂量IFNB的患者2年的临床结局。我们还评估了采用不同的切换患者标准是否对临床结果产生影响。方法随访2年,对患者进行RRMS治疗,并由于复发或按年度MRI扫描发现造影剂增强病灶(CELs)从低剂量转为大剂量IFNB。在随访期间评估了扩展的残疾状态量表(EDSS)评分以及临床复发。结果我们确定了121例转用大剂量IFNB的患者。一百例患者因发生一种或多种复发而增加了IFNB剂量,而21例患者由于存在一种或多种CEL(即使没有临床复发)而增加了IFNB剂量。在2年的随访结束时,有72(59.5%)例患者复发,其中51例(42.1%)达到了EDSS评分的持续进展。总体而言,有85位(70.3%)的患者在转换后表现出某种临床疾病活动(即复发或残疾进展)。因复发而转诊的患者增加IFNB剂量后的复发风险要比仅因MRI活动而转诊的患者更大(HR:5.55,p = 0.001)。 EDSS评分较高(HR:1.77,p结论)在大多数MS患者中,从低剂量IFNB切换到高剂量IFNB并不能降低2年随访期内进一步复发或增加残疾的风险。我们观察到仅根据MRI活动(即使没有临床发作)进行切换的患者再次复发的风险较低,因此有必要进行较大规模的研究,然后再建议根据MRI发现的切换算法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号