...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Neurology >Effect of a rescue or recurrence dose of lasmiditan on efficacy and safety in the acute treatment of migraine: findings from the phase 3 trials (SAMURAI and SPARTAN)
【24h】

Effect of a rescue or recurrence dose of lasmiditan on efficacy and safety in the acute treatment of migraine: findings from the phase 3 trials (SAMURAI and SPARTAN)

机译:抢救或复发剂量的Lamiditan对偏头痛急性治疗的疗效和安全性的影响:三期试验(SAMURAI和SPARTAN)的发现

获取原文
           

摘要

We studied the efficacy and safety of a second dose of lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine. SAMURAI and SPARTAN were double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 studies in which individuals with migraine were randomized to oral lasmiditan 50?mg (SPARTAN only), 100?mg, 200?mg, or placebo. Study drug was to be taken within 4?h (h) of onset of a migraine attack (moderate or severe pain). A second dose of study drug was provided for rescue (patient not pain-free at 2?h and took a second dose 2-24?h post-first dose) or recurrence (patient pain-free at 2?h, but experienced recurrence of mild, moderate, or severe migraine pain and took a second dose 2-24?h after first dose). Randomization to second dose occurred at baseline; patients originally assigned lasmiditan were randomized to the same lasmiditan dose or placebo (2:1 ratio), and those originally assigned placebo received placebo. Data from SAMURAI and SPARTAN were pooled for efficacy and safety assessment of a second dose of lasmiditan. The proportion of patients taking a second dose was lower with lasmiditan versus placebo, and decreased with increasing lasmiditan dose; the majority who took a second dose did so for rescue. In patients taking lasmiditan as first dose, outcomes (pain free, most bothersome symptom [MBS] free) at 2?h after a second dose for rescue were similar whether the second dose was lasmiditan or placebo (p??0.05 in all cases). In patients taking lasmiditan for first dose, outcomes at 2?h after a second dose for recurrence were as follows: lasmiditan pooled versus placebo - pain free, 50% vs 32% (p??0.05); MBS free, 71% vs 41% (p?=?0.02); pain relief, 77% vs 52% (p?=?0.03). In patients whose first dose was lasmiditan, the incidence of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) reported after the second dose was similar whether second dose was lasmiditan or placebo. A second dose of lasmiditan showed some evidence of efficacy when taken for headache recurrence. There was no clear benefit of a second dose of lasmiditan for rescue treatment. The incidences of TEAEs were similar whether the second dose was lasmiditan or placebo. SAMURAI ( NCT02439320 ) [April 2015]. SPARTAN ( NCT02605174 ) [May 2016].
机译:我们研究了第二剂Lamiditan对偏头痛的急性治疗的有效性和安全性。 SAMURAI和SPARTAN是双盲,安慰剂对照的3期研究,其中偏头痛患者被随机分为口服拉米替坦50?mg(仅SPARTAN),100?mg,200?mg或安慰剂。偏头痛发作(中度或重度疼痛)发作后4小时内应服用研究药物。提供第二剂研究药物用于抢救(患者在2?h时无疼痛,并在第一剂后2-24?h服用第二剂)或复发(患者在2?h无痛,但经历了复发)轻度,中度或重度偏头痛疼痛,并且在第一次给药后2-24?h服用第二次)。在基线时随机分配至第二剂;最初分配了拉米坦的患者被随机分配给相同剂量的拉米坦或安慰剂(比例为2:1),而最初分配了安慰剂的患者则接受了安慰剂。汇总来自SAMURAI和SPARTAN的数据,以评估第二剂Lamiditan的疗效和安全性。接受拉米坦治疗的患者第二次服用的比例低于安慰剂,随拉米坦治疗剂量的增加而降低;多数服用第二剂药物是为了营救。在以拉米替坦为首剂的患者中,无论是第二次使用拉米替坦还是安慰剂,所有患者在第二次抢救后2?h的结局(无疼痛,最无症状[MBS])均相似(在所有情况下,p?>?0.05) )。在首次服用拉米替坦的患者中,第二次复发后2?h的结局如下:拉米替坦合并安慰剂与无安慰剂相比,无痛,分别为50%和32%(p≥0.05);无MBS,71%和41%(p?=?0.02);疼痛缓解率分别为77%和52%(p?=?0.03)。在第一剂为拉米替坦的患者中,无论第二剂为拉米替坦还是安慰剂,在第二剂后报道的治疗紧急不良事件(TEAE)的发生率均相似。服用第二剂Lasmiditan可以减轻头痛的复发。第二次服用拉米替坦没有明显的益处可用于抢救治疗。不论第二剂是Lamiditan还是安慰剂,TEAE的发生率都相似。 SAMURAI(NCT02439320)[2015年4月]。 SPARTAN(NCT02605174)[2016年5月]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号